How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Graphs of exact and closed one-forms as Lagrangians
Example
Assume . The graph of is Lagrangian in for every smooth . More generally, the graph of every closed one-form is Lagrangian, including closed forms that are not exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth manifold and the canonical cotangent convention.
A one-form has Lagrangian graph exactly when it is closed. A graph of a one-form is Lagrangian exactly when the form is closed.
Verification
Since , [F1] makes Lagrangian. The same argument applies to any closed one-form, without asserting it is exact.
On , the global angular form is closed but not exact because its integral around the positively oriented circle is , whereas an exact form integrates to zero. Its graph is the section in , so [F1] supplies the promised closed-nonexact example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)