How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The dual trace basis for the type-A2 Hecke algebra
Example
Take the equal-parameter Hecke algebra of over , with basis
For the canonical trace , the inverse map on is
Thus the Gram matrix in the displayed ordered basis is
The trace-dual basis is , so the dual vector to is . It is not generally the algebra inverse: if , then , whereas the trace-dual vector to is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The equal-parameter type-A2 Hecke algebra over , its standard basis, and the coefficient-at-identity trace.
For finite , the canonical trace sends to . (The canonical Hecke trace and symmetrizing form)
For all , , and the trace-dual basis is . (The canonical Hecke trace is symmetric and perfect)
is the Laurent polynomial ring and . (Universal parameters, the generic Coxeter Hecke algebra and generator conjugacy)
The standard elements form an -basis, with multiplication for additive lengths. (The standard basis of the generic Hecke algebra and base change, Reduced-word independence of T_w and the length-multiplication rules)
Verification
Given: The data in Facts & Assumptions.
The reduced words for the six elements of give exactly the listed standard basis. Reversing each reduced word gives the displayed inverse map; in particular is its own inverse.
By [F1], is the coefficient-at-identity functional; applying [F2] to the ordered basis in step 1.1 gives exactly when the column index is , and otherwise. The resulting matrix is the displayed permutation matrix.
The matrix in step 2.1 permutes the coordinate basis by , so it has an inverse equal to itself and determinant , a unit in . Its dual vectors are therefore ; directly, .
The quadratic relation in [F3] gives , so and . The Laurent ring has distinct basis monomials and , hence ; thus , while step 3.1 shows itself is trace-dual to . This distinguishes the two notions explicitly.
Depends on
- The canonical Hecke trace and symmetrizing form
- The canonical Hecke trace is symmetric and perfect
- Universal parameters, the generic Coxeter Hecke algebra and generator conjugacy
- Reduced-word independence of T_w and the length-multiplication rules
- The standard basis of the generic Hecke algebra and base change
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Iwahori-Hecke Algebras and Schur Algebras of the Symmetric Group (self-contained notes, 1998; complete 79-page text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Meinolf Geck, Modular Representations of Hecke Algebras (EPFL lecture notes, arXiv:math/0511548v2) (standard reference, not scraped)