How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rank-one cyclotomic cell modules and their forms
Statement
Let be a field, let , and specialize the rank-one, level-two cyclotomic algebra to The two Murphy elements are and , ordered by . They form a cellular basis. The cell modules are one-dimensional, with acting by and , respectively, and the cell forms are the scalars and . At , the first form vanishes, the second does not, and with ; this specialized algebra has one simple module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , units , the rank-one cyclotomic presentation, the Murphy convention, and the coefficient-defined cell-module form.
The multiplicative cyclotomic Hecke algebra: at rank one the relation is , and is invertible.
Cyclotomic Murphy elements: the two one-box Murphy elements are and , with the stated dominance order and generator-fixing anti-involution.
Cell data, multipartition dominance, and higher-cell ideals: a cellular basis uses an involution-swapped basis and the fixed-first-index multiplication law modulo higher cells.
Cell modules, their forms, and radicals: the cell form is the same-cell product coefficient modulo higher cells.
Proof
Given: , , the quotient , and the candidate basis , .
For the cyclotomic factor is and the row subgroup is trivial; for the factor is empty and the row subgroup is trivial. Thus [F2] gives the displayed Murphy elements. In multipartition dominance the first component prefix is for and for , so the stated order holds.
Expanding the relation gives , hence . Therefore the Laurent quotient equals the polynomial quotient . Division by this monic quadratic gives a unique remainder of degree less than , so is a basis. Since , the change from to has determinant ; these Murphy elements are also a basis.
Direct multiplication gives Thus for any in the basis of step 2.1, , which is the fixed-row law in the upper cell. In the lower cell quotient, modulo the upper ideal, so . The involution fixes and hence both Murphy elements. These two calculations verify the cell axiom for both labels, so the displayed basis is cellular.
The upper form scalar is the coefficient in so it is . The lower basis element satisfies , giving form scalar .
If , then the defining polynomial is . Translation by identifies the quotient with , where is nonzero by the basis of step 2.1. The upper cell form is zero and the lower form is . To see directly that there is one simple module, let be simple. The subspace is a submodule. If it is nonzero then , which implies , contradicting and . Thus , and is a simple module over , hence one-dimensional.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard Dipper, Gordon James, and Andrew Mathas, Cyclotomic q-Schur algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift 229 (1998), 385–416 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete author-uploaded preliminary lecture manuscript (1998) (standard reference, not scraped)