How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rank-one approximation of a separated Cauchy block
Example
Take in and in . For and rank order , the first geometric term is . It gives a rank-one approximation with an exactly computable nonzero residual.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The four points and the order .
A separated Cauchy block has a geometric rank bound: for , the rank-one approximation has entries and each residual entry has absolute value at most .
Finite tensor arrays and the Frobenius inner product: the Frobenius norm is the square root of the sum of squared entry moduli.
Verification
The exact block is . The rank-one approximation is , so its rank is one.
The residual is , hence by [F2]. This attains the stated finite block bound at the entry .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steffen Börm, Lars Grasedyck, and Wolfgang Hackbusch, Hierarchical Matrices, MiS Lecture Note 21 (2003; revised June 2006), §§1.2–1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)