How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and both have homogeneous number
Example
For every ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural number .
, with both numbers equal to for the null graph (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number ).
The graph has every possible edge and has none (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Verification
If , both graphs are null and the assertion is [L1].
If , all vertices form a clique in and a stable set in , while neither graph has a vertex set larger than its whole vertex set.
Thus the maximum in [L1] is for both graphs.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Chudnovsky, The Erdos-Hajnal Conjecture: A Survey, sec. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)