Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Independent homological and internal shifts on graded K0

Example

Let k be a field, let A be a finite-dimensional unital graded k-algebra and let P be a finite graded projective left A-module, regarded as the bounded complex with P in cohomological degree 0 and all differentials zero. Then P[1]{2} is a graded perfect complex and its class in K0tri(Dperfgr(A)) satisfies [P[1]{2}]=−[P{2}]; identifying that group with K0gr(A) along the graded projective comparison, the same equality reads [P[1]{2}]=−v2[P], and the graded Cartan map carries this class to the element −v2[P] of G0gr(A). Here [1] is the cochain shift and {2} the internal grading shift: the sign −1 comes from the homological shift and the Laurent factor v2 from the internal shift. No finite-global-dimension hypothesis is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, a finite-dimensional unital graded k-algebra A, and a finite graded projective left A-module P, viewed as the complex with P in cohomological degree 0, zero in every other degree, and zero differential.

[F1]

For a graded module M and r∈Z the internal shift M{r} is the graded module with (M{r})d=Md−r carrying the same scalar action; it is invertible with (M{r}){−r}=M and M{0}=M. On graded complexes the internal shift acts termwise on the terms and leaves every differential unchanged; the cochain shift [1] and the internal shift act on different structures and commute with one another; they need not produce distinct isomorphism classes, since 0[1]≅0{1}≅0 (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts, Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version).

[F2]

Graded perfect objects are the objects of D(GrMod⁡0(A)) isomorphic to a bounded complex of finite graded projective left A-modules with degree-zero differentials, and Dperfgr(A) is an essentially small strictly full triangulated subcategory of D(GrMod⁡0(A)) (Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version, Perfect complexes form an essentially small triangulated subcategory).

[F3]

K0tri(T) of an essentially small triangulated category is the free abelian group on Iso⁡(T) modulo the distinguished-triangle relations [Y]=[X]+[Z]; in it [0]=0 and [X[n]]=(−1)n[X] for every integer n (Grothendieck group of an essentially small triangulated category, Shift signs and exact-functor maps on triangulated K0).

[F4]

Degree-zero inclusion induces an isomorphism from the split Grothendieck group of the finite graded projective left A-modules onto K0tri(Dperfgr(A)), sending [Q] to [Q[0]], whose inverse sends the class of a graded perfect object represented by a bounded finite-projective complex Q with degree-zero differentials to ∑n(−1)n[Qn] (Triangle K0 of perfect complexes equals split K0 of finite projectives).

[F5]

K0gr(A) is the split Grothendieck group of the finite-dimensional graded projective left A-modules and G0gr(A) the Grothendieck group of the finite-dimensional graded left A-modules; both are Z[v,v−1]-modules with vr[Q]=[Q{r}] and vr[M]=[M{r}], and the graded Cartan map cAgr:K0gr(A)→G0gr(A) sends [Q] to [Q] (Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map).

[F6]

A graded left A-module is finite graded projective if and only if it is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum of internal shifts A{r1}⊕⋯⊕A{rn} (Finite graded projective modules, Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F6algebra

By [F6] the module P is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum A{r1}⊕⋯⊕A{rn}; since A is finite dimensional over k, that sum and hence its summand P are finite dimensional, so P and P{2} are objects of the finite-dimensional graded module category in which K0gr(A) and G0gr(A) are formed. Applying the invertible shift {2} to the splitting exhibits P{2} as a degree-zero direct summand of A{r1+2}⊕⋯⊕A{rn+2}, so P{2} is again finite graded projective by [F6]. The stalk complex C with C0=P and all other terms and differentials zero is a bounded complex of finite graded projectives with zero, hence degree-zero, differentials, so C and its shifts are objects of Dperfgr(A) by [F2]. Internal shift acts termwise and does not touch cochain degrees, while the cochain shift does not touch the internal grading, so C{2}=P{2}[0] as complexes, and C[1]{2}=C{2}[1] is the complex with P{2} in cohomological degree −1 and zero differential, i.e. the class [P[1]{2}] is the class of (P{2})[1] in K0tri(Dperfgr(A)).

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Applying the shift-sign identity of [F3] inside the essentially small triangulated category Dperfgr(A) to the object X=C{2} gives [X[1]]=−[X], that is [C{2}[1]]=−[C{2}]; by step 1.1 the left-hand class is [P[1]{2}] and the right-hand class is −[P{2}[0]], so [P[1]{2}]=−[P{2}[0]] in K0tri(Dperfgr(A)).

2.2F4F5step 1.1algebra

In K0gr(A) the shift action gives v2[P]=[P{2}] by [F5], and the graded comparison of [F4] sends this class to ι∗(v2[P])=[(P{2})[0]]=[P{2}[0]]; independently, the inverse Euler class of [F4] evaluated on the two-term complex P[1]{2} of step 1.1, whose only nonzero term is P{2} in cohomological degree −1, equals (−1)−1[P{2}]=−v2[P]. Hence ι∗(v2[P])=[P{2}[0]] and ι∗−1([P[1]{2}])=−v2[P].

3.1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

Combining steps 2.1 and 2.2, [P[1]{2}]=−[P{2}[0]]=−ι∗(v2[P]); that is, identifying K0tri(Dperfgr(A)) with K0gr(A) along the comparison isomorphism ι∗ of [F4], the class of the homological-and-internal shift of the degree-zero complex is [P[1]{2}]=−v2[P], the sign coming from [1] and the factor v2 from {2}. Since the Cartan map of [F5] sends [Q]↦[Q] and both K0gr(A) and G0gr(A) have v acting by internal shift, cAgr(−v2[P])=−v2[P], so the image of [P[1]{2}] in G0gr(A) obeys the same formula −v2[P]. The differentials of P[1]{2} vanish identically because P sits in a single cohomological degree, so the internal shift introduces no cochain sign; only the homological shift contributes the sign −1, and no finite-global-dimension or Noetherian hypothesis is used.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources