How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent homological and internal shifts on graded K0
Example
Let be a field, let be a finite-dimensional unital graded -algebra and let be a finite graded projective left -module, regarded as the bounded complex with in cohomological degree and all differentials zero. Then is a graded perfect complex and its class in satisfies ; identifying that group with along the graded projective comparison, the same equality reads and the graded Cartan map carries this class to the element of . Here is the cochain shift and the internal grading shift: the sign comes from the homological shift and the Laurent factor from the internal shift. No finite-global-dimension hypothesis is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a finite-dimensional unital graded -algebra , and a finite graded projective left -module , viewed as the complex with in cohomological degree , zero in every other degree, and zero differential.
For a graded module and the internal shift is the graded module with carrying the same scalar action; it is invertible with and . On graded complexes the internal shift acts termwise on the terms and leaves every differential unchanged; the cochain shift and the internal shift act on different structures and commute with one another; they need not produce distinct isomorphism classes, since (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts, Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version).
Graded perfect objects are the objects of isomorphic to a bounded complex of finite graded projective left -modules with degree-zero differentials, and is an essentially small strictly full triangulated subcategory of (Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version, Perfect complexes form an essentially small triangulated subcategory).
of an essentially small triangulated category is the free abelian group on modulo the distinguished-triangle relations ; in it and for every integer (Grothendieck group of an essentially small triangulated category, Shift signs and exact-functor maps on triangulated K0).
Degree-zero inclusion induces an isomorphism from the split Grothendieck group of the finite graded projective left -modules onto , sending to , whose inverse sends the class of a graded perfect object represented by a bounded finite-projective complex with degree-zero differentials to (Triangle K0 of perfect complexes equals split K0 of finite projectives).
is the split Grothendieck group of the finite-dimensional graded projective left -modules and the Grothendieck group of the finite-dimensional graded left -modules; both are -modules with and , and the graded Cartan map sends to (Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map).
A graded left -module is finite graded projective if and only if it is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum of internal shifts (Finite graded projective modules, Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands).
Verification
By [F6] the module is a degree-zero direct summand of a finite direct sum ; since is finite dimensional over , that sum and hence its summand are finite dimensional, so and are objects of the finite-dimensional graded module category in which and are formed. Applying the invertible shift to the splitting exhibits as a degree-zero direct summand of , so is again finite graded projective by [F6]. The stalk complex with and all other terms and differentials zero is a bounded complex of finite graded projectives with zero, hence degree-zero, differentials, so and its shifts are objects of by [F2]. Internal shift acts termwise and does not touch cochain degrees, while the cochain shift does not touch the internal grading, so as complexes, and is the complex with in cohomological degree and zero differential, i.e. the class is the class of in .
Applying the shift-sign identity of [F3] inside the essentially small triangulated category to the object gives , that is ; by step 1.1 the left-hand class is and the right-hand class is , so in .
In the shift action gives by [F5], and the graded comparison of [F4] sends this class to ; independently, the inverse Euler class of [F4] evaluated on the two-term complex of step 1.1, whose only nonzero term is in cohomological degree , equals . Hence and .
Combining steps 2.1 and 2.2, ; that is, identifying with along the comparison isomorphism of [F4], the class of the homological-and-internal shift of the degree-zero complex is , the sign coming from and the factor from . Since the Cartan map of [F5] sends and both and have acting by internal shift, , so the image of in obeys the same formula . The differentials of vanish identically because sits in a single cohomological degree, so the internal shift introduces no cochain sign; only the homological shift contributes the sign , and no finite-global-dimension or Noetherian hypothesis is used.
Depends on
- Shift signs and exact-functor maps on triangulated K0
- Triangle K0 of perfect complexes equals split K0 of finite projectives
- Graded Grothendieck groups, shift action, and Cartan map
- Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts
- Perfect complexes over a ring and its graded version
- Perfect complexes form an essentially small triangulated subcategory
- Grothendieck group of an essentially small triangulated category
- Finite graded projectives are finite shifted-free summands
- Finite graded projective modules
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Khovanov and Seidel, Quivers, Floer Cohomology, and Braid Group Actions, §§2c and 2e.1 (standard reference, not scraped)