How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-dimensional Hotelling statistic and its exact F cutoff
Example
Assume AC and use the iid multivariate-normal sample model with , , and fixed positive-definite covariance . For the observation , , , and , test with . The sample mean is zero, the sample covariance is , the Hotelling statistic is , and its scaled statistic is . For a chosen , the exact test rejects precisely when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the iid sample model with fixed , the four displayed observed vectors, , , , and .
The sample covariance is . The iid multivariate-normal sample and covariance conventions
Under AC, in the iid multivariate-normal model with and , when and is zero otherwise. Under , has law . The one-sample Hotelling statistic has an exact F law
Under the same model assumptions and , the test rejects when the scaled statistic exceeds the quantile and has exact null size over all . The one-sample Hotelling F test has exact size alpha
is the unique -quantile of the F distribution for positive degrees of freedom. Student t and Fisher F laws Student t and Fisher F CDFs are continuous and strictly increasing on their supports
Verification
The four vectors sum to zero, so . Their outer products sum to , hence and by [F1]. This matrix is positive definite and has inverse .
The difference has squared Euclidean norm . Therefore [F2] gives , and the scale makes the F statistic equal .
By [F3]–[F4], applying the exact test rule to this observation is exactly the stated comparison . The example reports the rule as a function of and does not infer a rejection decision without choosing .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arak Mathai, Serge Provost, and Hans J. Haubold, Multivariate Statistical Analysis in the Real and Complex Domains, Chapter 6 §§6.3–6.4, PDF pp. 20–42 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Soumendu Mukherjee, Multivariate Analysis 2021, Lecture 3, PDF pp. 1–5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter D. Hoff, Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Duke STA 832 lecture notes, relevant sections in Chapters 4 and 7 (standard reference, not scraped)