Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An adjoint-range feature has an exact one-probe estimator

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Let X=H=R2 with the Euclidean inner product, let K(x1,x2)=(x1,x2/2), fix ϵ>0, and let Z be a jointly Gaussian centered family on H, linear into L2 with covariance E[Z(g)Z(k)]=⟨g,k⟩H. Define Yx(g)=⟨Kx,g⟩H+ϵZ(g) and consider the feature ϕ(x1,x2)=x1. The map K is compact, K∗(1,0)=(1,0), and the observation Yx(1,0) is an unbiased exact estimator of ϕ(x) with variance ϵ2. Thus the feature vector lies in the adjoint range and is exactly estimable by one probe.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional inverse model and feature in the Example, with ϵ>0.

[F1]

A feature x↦⟨x,h⟩ is exactly estimable by one probe precisely when h∈R(K∗). Exact linear feature estimability through the adjoint range

[F2]

In a compact inverse model, the parameter and data spaces are Hilbert spaces and the forward map is compact and linear. Compact linear inverse model between Hilbert spaces

[F3]

Every bounded finite-rank operator is compact. Bounded finite rank operators are compact

Proof

1.1givenF2F3algebra

The matrix of K in the standard basis is diag⁡(1,1/2), so its range is two-dimensional and it is bounded. It is compact by [F3], hence it satisfies the compact inverse-model hypothesis [F2]. The matrix is self-adjoint, so K∗=K and K∗(1,0)=(1,0), the Riesz vector of ϕ.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

The isonormal model gives ExYx(1,0)=⟨Kx,(1,0)⟩=x1 and Var⁡xYx(1,0)=ϵ2∥(1,0)∥2=ϵ2. Since [F1] applies to the feature vector (1,0)=K∗(1,0), this probe is exact and has the asserted finite variance.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources