Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compact diagonal map has a closure-only feature

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Set I={j∈N:j≥1}. On the real Hilbert space X=H=ℓ2(I,R) with standard basis (ej)j∈I, define Kx=(xj/j)j∈I and the feature vector h=(1/j)j∈I. Fix ϵ>0, let Z be a jointly Gaussian centered family indexed by H, linear into L2 with covariance E[Z(g)Z(k)]=⟨g,k⟩H, and define Yx(g)=⟨Kx,g⟩H+ϵZ(g). The map K is compact and self-adjoint. Its adjoint range contains every finitely supported sequence, so R(K∗)‾=ℓ2(I,R). The vector h belongs to ℓ2(I,R) but not to R(K∗), since any preimage would have all coordinates equal to 1. Thus this feature lies in the closure of the adjoint range but is not exactly estimable by one probe.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real square-summable sequence Hilbert space, its standard basis, the diagonal map and feature in the Example.

[F1]

The real square-summable sequences form a Hilbert space with inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑jxjyj and norm squared ∑jxj2. This holds for I as well as N: the bijective linear reindexing (xj)j∈I↦(xn+1)n∈N preserves inner products and norms, hence transfers completeness from ℓ2(N,R). The real square-summable sequence space is complete, Hilbert space

[F2]

For a square-summable sequence indexed by I, its coordinate truncations converge in norm because ∑j>Nxj2→0. Thus the standard coordinate vectors are orthonormal with dense span, hence form a complete orthonormal basis to which Fourier expansion applies. Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I), Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space

[F3]
[F4]

Every bounded finite-rank operator is compact, and under Countable Choice an operator-norm limit of compact operators into a Banach space is compact. Bounded finite rank operators are compact, Norm limit of compact operators is compact, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F5]

The adjoint identity is ⟨Kx,y⟩=⟨x,K∗y⟩. The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator

[F6]

A feature vector is exactly estimable by one probe iff it belongs to R(K∗). Exact linear feature estimability through the adjoint range

[F7]

The compact inverse model has Hilbert parameter and data spaces and a compact forward map. Compact linear inverse model between Hilbert spaces

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited through the compactness of norm limits in [F4], the Hilbert adjoint in [F5], Fourier expansion in [F2], and the exact-estimability interface in [F6]. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4F5F7A1algebraconstruct

The map is linear and ∥Kx∥22=∑jxj2/j2≤∥x∥22, so it is bounded. For N≥1, let KNx retain only the first N output coordinates. Its range is spanned by e1,…,eN, and ∥KNx∥2≤∥x∥2 makes it bounded, so [F4] makes KN compact. Also ∥(K−KN)x∥22=∑j>Nxj2/j2≤(N+1)−2∥x∥22, with equality in the operator norm on eN+1. Thus ∥K−KN∥=1/(N+1)→0, and [F4] makes K compact. The diagonal real entries show ⟨Kx,y⟩=∑jxjyj/j=⟨x,Ky⟩; by [F5], K∗=K. For every finitely supported z, the sequence xj=jzj is finitely supported and Kx=z, so c00⊆R(K∗). Truncations are dense in ℓ2 by [F2], proving R(K∗)‾=ℓ2.

2.1givenF1F3F6step 1.1algebra∎

By [F3], h=(1/j) is square-summable. If K∗x=h, self-adjointness and the coordinate equations give xj/j=1/j, hence xj=1 for every j. But the first N squared coordinates of such an x sum to N for every N, so no finite bound can contain all partial sums; this contradicts x∈ℓ2. Therefore h∉R(K∗). Since h∈R(K∗)‾ by step 1.1, [F6] shows that the feature is not exactly estimable by a single probe despite lying in the closure of the adjoint range.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources