Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compactly supported smooth conductivity in the higher-dimensional class

Example

Fix d≥3, α∈(0,1), x0=(1/2,…,1/2), a=1/4, D=B(x0,a)⊂(0,1)d, and D′=B(x0,a/2). Choose a nonzero ψ∈Cc∞(B(0,1)) that equals one on B‾(0,1/2), put Nα=∥ψ∥C1,α(Rd), and set ϕ=ψ/max⁡{1,Nα}. Here the C1,α norm is the maximum of the suprema of the function, its first derivatives, and the α-Hölder seminorms of its first derivatives. Let r=a/4, ε=min⁡{1/4,r1+α/8}, and γ(x)=1+εϕ((x−x0)/r) on D. For m=1/2, M=3/2, and R=2, this coefficient belongs to Xd(2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥3, α∈(0,1), D=B(x0,1/4), D′=B(x0,1/8), the bump ψ from the statement, its norm Nα, the normalized function ϕ, r=1/16, ε=min⁡{1/4,r1+α/8}, and γ=1+εϕ((x−x0)/r).

[F1]

In dimensions d≥3, membership in Xd(R) requires m≤γ≤M, equality to 1 outside D′, and ∥γ∥C1,α(D‾)≤R with the norm stated in the class definition. (Calderón admissible conductivity classes)

[F2]

For 0<s<t, a smooth function exists that equals one on B‾(0,s) and has support contained in B(0,t). (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2givenalgebra

By [F2] with radii 1/2<1, a bump ψ as in the Example exists; it is nonzero since it equals one on B(0,1/2). Its first and second derivatives are bounded because it is smooth with compact support. If ∣x−y∣≤1, the mean-value estimate gives ∣∇ψ(x)−∇ψ(y)∣≤∥D2ψ∥∞∣x−y∣≤∥D2ψ∥∞∣x−y∣α; if ∣x−y∣≥1, the quotient is at most 2∥∇ψ∥∞. Thus 0<Nα<∞ and the normalization yields 0≠ϕ with ∥ϕ∥C1,α≤1.

2.1F1step 1.1givenalgebra

The support of x↦ϕ((x−x0)/r) lies in B(x0,r)⊂D′, so γ=1 on D∖D′. Since ∣ϕ∣≤1 and ε≤1/4, its values lie in [3/4,5/4]⊂[1/2,3/2].

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The sup norm of the perturbation is at most ε≤1/4. Its first derivative suprema are at most ε/r≤rα/8≤1/8, and the α-Hölder seminorm of each first derivative is at most εr−1−α[∇ϕ]Cα≤1/8 by scaling the Hölder quotient. The derivatives of the constant background vanish, so ∥γ∥C1,α(D‾)≤5/4<2. All conditions in [F1] hold, hence γ∈Xd(2).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources