How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A proper Gaussian prior yields a credible interval with undercoverage
Example
Assume AC. Observe with fixed truth , , and proper prior . Let and , let be the unique number satisfying , and put . The posterior is , so the central interval has posterior mass exactly for every . At the fixed truth , its frequentist coverage is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the one-dimensional normal likelihood and proper normal prior in the Example, with and .
AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The Axiom of Choice
Posterior credibility and frequentist coverage: posterior mass is computed under the data-indexed posterior kernel, while frequentist coverage is the fixed-truth sampling probability of set membership.
Standard normal and normal laws: has a positive symmetric standard normal density, and is its affine image under .
If is continuous on a closed interval , then every value between and equals for some . Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and
Verification
Given: The hypotheses in the Example and Facts & Assumptions.
Under [A1], the standard normal probability law of [F2] is supplied. Its density is positive and symmetric and integrates to one, so is continuous and strictly increasing, with and as . Choose with . By [F3] on , there is a unique with .
The prior density times likelihood is proportional to times a factor independent of . Normalization gives posterior law .
Under the fixed truth , write . The event is equivalent to , hence to .
The interval membership graph is , the inverse image of the closed interval under a continuous map. It is closed, hence Borel, so the sampling membership event is measurable.
Under that posterior, is standard normal. The interval radius therefore gives posterior mass for every observed .
Since the standard normal density is positive and symmetric, . Thus the interval has posterior mass but frequentist coverage below at .
Remarks
A separate one-observation Bernoulli example with a uniform prior has zero coverage at the truth ; that conclusion is specific to its Bernoulli likelihood and prior. The Gaussian calculation above uses a different proper prior and sampling law.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.