How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In , the two vertices in the two-part have three internally disjoint paths and a minimum separator of size three
Example
Let have two-part and three-part . The paths for are internally vertex-disjoint, and is a minimum - separator.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed complete bipartite graph .
For nonadjacent terminals, finite vertex Menger equates maximum internally disjoint paths and minimum vertex separators (Menger's theorem: the finite directed and undirected arc, edge and nonadjacent-vertex forms).
Verification
Verification technique: direct.
The three paths , , and have distinct internal vertices.
Deleting all three destroys every - path, while deleting fewer leaves some and its two-edge path.
The terminals are nonadjacent, so [L1] agrees with the direct calculation: both the packing and separator numbers equal three.
This is a concrete equality case for the local undirected vertex form.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.