How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
L(3,1) correction terms in the stated orientation convention
Example
Use the orientation and cyclic labels for which . For , the correction terms are , , and . Reversing orientation negates all three values.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated orientation convention and the three labels .
For every and canonical label , the stated correction-term formula holds; reversing orientation negates the value at the conjugate label (Lens-space correction-term formula for L(p,1)).
Proof
Given: The data above.
For , and , so [F1] gives .
For , the numerator is ; for , it is . Both denominators are , so the other two values are . Orientation reversal negates each by [F1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter S. Ozsvath and Zoltan Szabo, Absolutely Graded Floer Homologies and Intersection Forms for Four-Manifolds with Boundary (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jennifer Hom, Lecture Notes on Heegaard Floer Homology (standard reference, not scraped)