Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lens-space correction-term formula for L(p,1)

Statement

Use the Ozsvath–Szabo orientation convention L(p,1) given by positive p-surgery on the unknot and label its Spinc structures by i∈Z/pZ, represented by 0≤i<p. For every integer p≥1, d(L(p,1),i)=(2i−p)2−p4p. For the opposite orientation the correction terms are negated, with the conjugate Spinc label understood.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The q-one lens triangles and their cyclic handle maps supplies the explicit individual index-zero, basepoint-zero count-one triangles, their cyclic maps and Chern evaluation k=2i−p on a generator of square −p.

[F2]

Absolute rational Heegaard Floer grading and fixed-Spin-c cobordism maps constructs the absolute grading, with the sphere generator at degree zero, and proves the degree formula for these actual fixed-Spinc handle maps.

[F3]

Heegaard invariance and well-definedness of the correction term identifies the correction term as the bottom degree of the infinity image. The convention in the statement is Lens spaces in the p/q filling orientation convention.

Proof

Given: p≥1 and a label 0≤i<p, with the torus diagrams and fixed triangle structures of [F1].

1.1F1F3

The alpha-gamma diagram, and the diagram with those two attaching curves reversed, each have one intersection in each Spinc structure. Their infinity differentials are zero: the Maslov index of a self-disk in a torsion Spinc structure is 2nz, so cannot be one. The minus lattice in each summand is therefore exactly UF2[U][xi,0], and its plus image has bottom [xi,0]. Its correction term is the absolute grading of that generator, with no unknown exponent shift.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

For the negative-trace map from S3 to −L(p,1), the fixed triangle has index and basepoint multiplicity zero and count one. It sends the sphere generator at exponent zero to [xi,0]. The four-dimensional data are c12=−k2/p, χ=1 and σ=−1. Hence its degree is Di=(1−k2/p)/4, and d(−L(p,1),i)=Di. This computes the negative orientation directly.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1

The cyclically reordered triangle gives the actual fixed-structure map from L(p,1) to S3 and sends [xi,0] to the sphere generator at exponent zero. It is the same oriented triple four-manifold with the other sphere input filled, so it has the same degree Di. Consequently 0=gr⁡[xi,0]+Di, and d(L(p,1),i)=−Di=((2i−p)2−p)/(4p). This argument uses an actual turned-around triangle map rather than a general grading-duality assertion.

4.1F1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The characteristic labels under orientation reversal or conjugation are paired by k↦−k, equivalently i↦p−i modulo p. Their squares agree, so the two computations give exactly the asserted negation for the opposite orientation with the conjugate label. For p=1 the same computation has k=−1 and both correction terms zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources