Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Correction-term inequality from a rational-ball cobordism map

Statement

Let B be a smooth compact connected oriented four-manifold with H∗(B;Q)≅H∗(point;Q) and oriented boundary the rational homology sphere Y, where H∗(Y;Q)≅H∗(S3;Q). Let t be a boundary Spinc structure extending over B. Removing an open four-ball from the interior gives a Spinc cobordism W with boundary −S3⊔Y, and each boundary inclusion induces an isomorphism on rational homology. In both orientations, the induced Heegaard Floer infinity map is an isomorphism of degree zero and the corresponding plus-map inequality gives d(Y,t)≥0 and d(Y,t)≤0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Puncturing a rational homology ball gives a rational homology cobordism gives the two rational homology inclusion isomorphisms, the boundary orientations, χ(W)=0 and the zero rational intersection module.

[F2]

Absolute rational Heegaard Floer grading and fixed-Spin-c cobordism maps and Infinity standardness and fixed-Spin-c rational-cobordism isomorphisms construct, for each fixed extending Spinc structure, the compatible infinity and plus maps and prove the degree-zero infinity isomorphism.

[F3]

Heegaard invariance and well-definedness of the correction term supplies the grading-preserving tower and its bottom degree, with d(S3)=0; Commuting Laurent and plus maps compare their bottom degrees supplies the bottom-degree comparison for the commuting square.

Proof

Given: The stated rational homology ball, its oriented boundary, and an extending Spinc structure; let W be obtained by removing an interior open ball.

1.1F1F2

The two boundary inclusions are rational homology isomorphisms and H2(W;Q)=0. In particular the square of the Chern class is zero, and χ(W)=σ(W)=0. The same assertions hold for the reverse cobordism from Y to S3. For each of the fixed induced Spinc structures, the constructed infinity map is an isomorphism with degree (0−2⋅0−3⋅0)/4=0, and the corresponding plus map commutes with the infinity-to-plus projection. This uses the individual fixed-structure conclusion, including torsion extensions.

2.1F3step 1.1∎

Apply the supplied commuting-square comparison first to W:S3→Y and then to its reverse Y→S3. The degree-zero isomorphisms give respectively d(Y,t)≥d(S3)=0 and d(S3)=0≥d(Y,t). These are exactly the two stated inequalities in both orientations.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources