Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A rational homology ball bounded by L(4,1)

Statement

Assume AC. Let Q⊂CP2 be the nonsingular complex conic parametrized by [s:t]↦[s2:st:t2], let N(Q) be a closed tubular disk bundle, and let B2=CP2∖int⁡N(Q)‾. Then B2 is a smooth compact four-manifold with H∗(B2;Q)≅H∗(point;Q). Its boundary is the circle bundle of Euler number 4 over S2, hence is the lens space L(4,1) up to orientation; orient B2 so that the boundary agrees with the stated lens-space convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and the complex-oriented projective plane, its conic Q, and a closed tubular disk bundle N(Q).

[A1]

AC is assumed by the UCT, tubular-neighbourhood, Thom, Poincare-duality, geometric-intersection, and self-intersection suppliers; AC implies the ACω hypotheses of the lens-space convention (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

The standard filtration CP0⊂CP1⊂CP2 and affine charts give one cell in dimensions 0,2,4; cellular and universal-coefficient comparison compute its integral homology and cohomology (Complex projective space and its holomorphic charts, Cellular homology computes singular homology, The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID).

[F2]

Excision identifies H∗(CP2,B2;Z) with H∗(N(Q),∂N(Q);Z), and the normalized oriented rank-two Thom class identifies the latter with H∗−2(Q;Z) and evaluates +1 on each positive normal disk. Its relative-to-absolute image in degree two is the Poincare dual of Q, with sign (−1)2⋅2=+1 (Excision for singular cohomology, Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles, Thom class by fiberwise normalization, The normal Thom class realizes the Poincare dual of a closed submanifold).

[F3]

The complex orientation supplies the fundamental class; Poincare duality identifies H2(CP2;Z) with H2(CP2;Z); the geometric intersection pairing equals the Poincare-dual cup pairing and depends only on homology classes; homotopic maps induce the same homology map; and the local sign of a transverse intersection is determined by the ordered tangent orientations (Fundamental class of a compact oriented manifold, Poincaré duality for oriented topological manifolds, The geometric intersection number is the Poincare-dual cup pairing, Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology, The local oriented intersection sign, The geometric intersection pairing on a closed oriented manifold, The oriented intersection number).

[F4]

The self-intersection of a compact oriented surface in an oriented four-manifold equals the Euler number of its oriented normal bundle (The self-intersection number of a complementary-dimensional oriented submanifold, The self-intersection number is the Euler number of the normal bundle).

[F5]

The lens-space convention defines L(p,1) by +p filling of the standard unknot exterior; the nonsingular surgery matrix gives H1≅Z/p (Lens spaces in the p/q filling orientation convention, Inverse-matrix formula for a surgery linking form). The lens-space convention assumes countable choice, which follows from AC (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F6]

The cohomology long exact sequence of the pair (CP2,B2) computes the cohomology of the complement from the relative and absolute groups (Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology).

Proof

1.1A1F1F3givenalgebra

Choose the filtration CP0⊂P⊂CP2 with P={y=0}≅CP1 and CP0=[1:0:0]. Its successive complements are C and C2, so the cellular boundary maps vanish for degree reasons and H2(CP2;Z)=Z[P], H4(CP2;Z)=Z[CP2]; UCT gives free cohomology, and put h=PD[P]. The projective maps Tt([x:y:z])=[x:y+tx:z] (0≤t≤1) give a homotopy from the inclusion of P to that of P′={y=x}. The two lines meet transversely at [0:0:1] with positive sign, since a complex-linear isomorphism between their tangent complex lines and the ambient complex plane has positive real determinant. By [F3], [P]2=1. On the charts s≠0 and t≠0, the conic map [s:t]↦[s2:st:t2] has target coordinates (u,u2) with u=t/s and (v2,v) with v=s/t, respectively; these recover the source coordinate and have injective derivatives. Its image is exactly xz−y2=0: if x≠0 the point is [1:y/x:(y/x)2], and if x=0 then y=0 and the point is [0:0:1]. The same chart descriptions show the zero set is a smooth complex-oriented sphere and the map is an embedding. The line P meets it at the two simple roots st=0, both transversely and positively in the complex orientations. Thus [F3] gives [Q]⋅[P]=2; because [P] generates H2, this implies [Q]=2[P], hence [Q]⋅[Q]=4.

2.1A1F4F5step 1.1constructalgebra

The normal Euler number of Q is therefore 4 by [F4]. Its unit normal circle bundle is the boundary of its tubular disk bundle. Compute its genus-one gluing directly from the conic charts, without assuming an Euler-to-surgery identification. In the chart x=1 write the surface as (y,z)=(u,u2) and use normal coordinate n=z−y2. In the chart z=1 use normal coordinate n′=x−y2. Their change is n′=(z−y2)/z2; differentiating in the normal direction on the conic gives n′=u−4n in the normal line bundle. On the equator u=eiφ its unit normal circle transition is therefore θN=θS−4φ. Each closed hemisphere has its actual displayed complex normal frame, so its unit circle bundle is D2×S1, a solid torus. On their common torus let m be the equator loop at fixed θS, and l the fiber loop. The southern solid-torus meridian is m, and the northern meridian is m+4l, since holding θN fixed gives that exact slope. Identify the southern solid torus with the standard unknot exterior by l=μU, m=λU: its fiber is the core circle, while its base disk is the exterior meridian disk. The second filling slope is therefore 4μU+λU, with the global boundary orientation determined by the product identifications. If those identifications reverse the desired global orientation, reverse the orientation of the total space; the statement permits exactly that choice. Thus [F5] identifies the total circle bundle with L(4,1) up to orientation, by an actual meridian calculation. The complement has the opposite boundary orientation to its tubular neighborhood in the complex-oriented projective plane; choose the orientation of B2 as allowed in the Statement so its boundary agrees with the declared lens-space convention.

2.2A1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

By [F2], the relative cohomology groups of (CP2,B2) are Z in degrees 2 and 4 and zero otherwise, since Q≅S2. The relative-to-absolute map in degree two sends the Thom generator to PD[Q]: the normal-Thom sign is (−1)2⋅2=+1 by [F2]. By step 1.1, [Q]=2[P], so this map is multiplication by 2 under h=PD[P]. For degree four, let a be the positive generator of H2(Q;Z), with ⟨a,[Q]⟩=1. The Thom image of a evaluates on [CP2] as ⟨a,[Q]⟩: excision reduces the evaluation to the normal disk fibers, and the normalized Thom class evaluates +1 on each such fiber by [F2]. Thus the degree-four relative-to-absolute map sends a generator to a generator and is an isomorphism.

3.1A1F1F6step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎

By [F6], the cohomology long exact sequence of the pair gives H1(B2;Z)=0, H2(B2;Z)≅Z/2, and Hj(B2;Z)=0 for every j≥3: in degree one the map Z→Z is injective multiplication by 2, in degree two its cokernel is Z/2 and the next relative group is zero, and in degree four the relative-to-absolute map is an isomorphism. In degree zero, the relative group vanishes, so H0(CP2;Z)→H0(B2;Z) is an isomorphism; hence B2 is connected. Repeat the relative calculation over Q: the degree-two map is multiplication by 2 and the degree-four map is the identity, both isomorphisms, so the pair sequence gives Hj(B2;Q)=0 for j>0 and H0(B2;Q)=Q. The UCT over Q then gives the rational homology of a point. Together with step 2.1 this proves that B2 is a rational homology ball bounded by L(4,1).

Remark

The picture is the one-component surgery diagram for the boundary circle bundle. The planar circle has no crossings and represents the unknot; its integer framing is specified by the label +4, meaning the chosen parallel has linking number +4 with the core. The proof identifies this handle attachment from the normal disk bundle and does not depend on the drawing.

\begin{tikzpicture}
  \draw[thick] (0,0) circle (0.7);
  \node at (0,1.05) {$+4$};
  \node at (0,-1.05) {$U$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

147 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources