How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology
Statement
For every subspace and abelian group there is an exact sequence Here comes from including the relative cochains, is restriction, and the connector sends a cocycle class to , for any cochain extension of to . Negative groups are zero, so the sequence begins .
Facts & Assumptions
Relative singular cochain complex identifies relative cochains with absolute cochains vanishing on simplices in , and defines their cohomology quotient.
Singular cochain complex with coefficients identifies cochains with arbitrary functions on simplices and uses positive precomposition coboundary; The singular coboundary squares to zero gives .
Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial makes restriction a cochain map and supplies its induced map on cohomology.
Proof
Given: The pair and coefficients of the statement. Abbreviate the relative, absolute and subspace cochain complexes by , respectively, and their differentials by .
In every degree, restriction is onto: extend a function on simplices in by zero on all other simplices of , using [F2]. Its kernel is exactly by [F1], and is inclusion. These maps commute with by [F1] and [F3]. Thus is termwise exact. Extension by zero is a linear degreewise section, and is not asserted to be a cochain map. For negative degrees the exact row consists of zeros.
Let be a cocycle and choose an extension as in step 1.1. Then , so ; it is closed by . Two extensions differ by an element and their differentials differ by the relative coboundary . If , extend to ; then extends and has the same differential as . Combining the two observations proves representative independence. Sum extensions and integer multiples prove that is a homomorphism.
At , every relative class restricts to zero. Conversely if a cocycle has , write in . Extend to . Then is a relative cocycle representing . For , and its extension are zero, since negative cochains vanish; the same reasoning is valid. Hence this kernel is exactly the relative image.
At , a global cocycle restricting to has zero connecting class. Conversely if , an extension has for some . Then is a cocycle of restricting to , so lies in the restriction image. This proves exactness there in both directions.
At , a connecting representative is a coboundary in , so its class maps to zero. Conversely if a relative cocycle is a global coboundary , then is a cocycle of since . Its connector, using the extension , is . This proves exactness at the third type of position. If this relative degree is zero, forces , establishing the initial injection explicitly.
All integer degrees and all three types of position are covered by steps 3.1, 2.2 and 3.2, proving the long exact sequence and its connector. If , then and , so the sequence consists of identity and zero maps. If , then and restriction is identity. Empty or zero give zero sequences. For a point and either of its two subspaces these same endpoint cases apply. The explicit extension-by-zero function is available without selecting any elements of beyond its specified zero; no AC, projectivity or injectivity of is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Singular cohomology satisfies the Eilenberg Steenrod cohomology axioms Corollary
- Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space Example
- Mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space Example
- Local coordinate cup products generate top relative cohomology Lemma
- Positive-degree cup products on a suspension vanish Proposition
- Relative cup products are natural and connector-compatible Proposition
- Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere Theorem
- Fully relative Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
- Mayer vietoris sequence in singular cohomology Theorem
- Naturality of the singular cohomology pair sequence Theorem
- Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, section 3.1, Relative Groups and the Long Exact Sequence of a Pair, printed pages 199–200 (standard reference, not scraped)