How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology
Statement
For every subspace and abelian group there is an exact sequence Here comes from including the relative cochains, is restriction, and the connector sends a cocycle class to , for any cochain extension of to . Negative groups are zero, so the sequence begins .
Facts & Assumptions
Relative singular cochain complex identifies relative cochains with absolute cochains vanishing on simplices in , and defines their cohomology quotient.
Singular cochain complex with coefficients identifies cochains with arbitrary functions on simplices and uses positive precomposition coboundary; The singular coboundary squares to zero gives .
Singular cohomology is contravariantly functorial makes restriction a cochain map and supplies its induced map on cohomology.
Proof
Given: The pair and coefficients of the statement. Abbreviate the relative, absolute and subspace cochain complexes by , respectively, and their differentials by .
In every degree, restriction is onto: extend a function on simplices in by zero on all other simplices of , using [F2]. Its kernel is exactly by [F1], and is inclusion. These maps commute with by [F1] and [F3]. Thus is termwise exact. Extension by zero is a linear degreewise section, and is not asserted to be a cochain map. For negative degrees the exact row consists of zeros.
Let be a cocycle and choose an extension as in step 1.1. Then , so ; it is closed by . Two extensions differ by an element and their differentials differ by the relative coboundary . If , extend to ; then extends and has the same differential as . Combining the two observations proves representative independence. Sum extensions and integer multiples prove that is a homomorphism.
At , every relative class restricts to zero. Conversely if a cocycle has , write in . Extend to . Then is a relative cocycle representing . For , and its extension are zero, since negative cochains vanish; the same reasoning is valid. Hence this kernel is exactly the relative image.
At , a global cocycle restricting to has zero connecting class. Conversely if , an extension has for some . Then is a cocycle of restricting to , so lies in the restriction image. This proves exactness there in both directions.
At , a connecting representative is a coboundary in , so its class maps to zero. Conversely if a relative cocycle is a global coboundary , then is a cocycle of since . Its connector, using the extension , is . This proves exactness at the third type of position. If this relative degree is zero, forces , establishing the initial injection explicitly.
All integer degrees and all three types of position are covered by steps 3.1, 2.2 and 3.2, proving the long exact sequence and its connector. If , then and , so the sequence consists of identity and zero maps. If , then and restriction is identity. Empty or zero give zero sequences. For a point and either of its two subspaces these same endpoint cases apply. The explicit extension-by-zero function is available without selecting any elements of beyond its specified zero; no AC, projectivity or injectivity of is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Double-cover correction terms obstruct smooth sliceness Corollary
- Singular cohomology satisfies the Eilenberg Steenrod cohomology axioms Corollary
- Bockstein connecting operation Definition
- Boundary middle form and boundary signature Definition
- Stable natural cohomology operation Definition
- The Milnor lambda candidate from a supplied filling Definition
- Flat connections and real characteristic classes Example
- Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space Example
- Mod-two cohomology ring of real projective space Example
- A rational homology ball bounded by L(4,1) Lemma
- Disk-pair cohomology over an arbitrary commutative ring Lemma
- Local coordinate cup products generate top relative cohomology Lemma
- Mod-two cohomology ring of infinite real projective space Lemma
- Mod-two cohomology rings of complex projective spaces Lemma
- Oriented real two-plane splitting with real-cohomology injection Lemma
- Pullback of the Thom class along a transverse section computes the Euler class Lemma
- Relative lifts produce cohomological transgressions Lemma
- Spin-c extensions over a rational ball form a metabolizer coset Lemma
- Steenrod squares commute with relative cohomology connectors Lemma
- The fifth stable offset in integral Eilenberg–Mac Lane homology vanishes Lemma
- The first connective complex K-theory Postnikov invariant is integral Sq-three Lemma
- The fundamental path-fibration class has the normalized relative lift Lemma
- The normal Thom class realizes the Poincare dual of a closed submanifold Lemma
- The relative Pontryagin square glues across a seven-dimensional boundary Lemma
- The restriction image on a cobordism boundary is Lagrangian Lemma
- The Thom quotient identifies relative and reduced cohomology Lemma
- Bocksteins are natural and stable Proposition
- Collapse pulls the Thom class back to the Poincaré dual Proposition
- Positive-degree cup products on a suspension vanish Proposition
- Relative cup products are natural and connector-compatible Proposition
- Steenrod normalization, instability, suspension, and top square Proposition
- Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere Theorem
- Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients Theorem
- Cohomological Serre spectral sequence Theorem
- Fully relative Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
- Gysin long exact sequence of an oriented sphere bundle Theorem
- Mayer vietoris sequence in singular cohomology Theorem
- Naturality of the singular cohomology pair sequence Theorem
- Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes Theorem
- Pair exact sequences with local coefficients Theorem
…and 6 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, section 3.1, Relative Groups and the Long Exact Sequence of a Pair, printed pages 199–200 (standard reference, not scraped)