How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Known-variance normal mean interval
Example
Assume AC as in the library's construction of the normal laws. Observe one real-valued , where , the known standard deviation , and . Define , and let be its -quantile. Then has exact confidence level .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; an experiment indexed by with , fixed known , and .
The Axiom of Choice: assume the axiom of choice, as required by the normal-law definition used here.
Standard normal and normal laws: is the law of an affine image of a standard normal variable, whose density is positive on .
Pivotal quantities: a parameter-indexed family of measurable maps is a pivot when its pushforward law is the same at every parameter.
Confidence sets and coverage: the confidence set is measured by the probability that it contains the true parameter.
Coverage from pivot inversion and exact calibration: an acceptance set of pivot probability yields exact coverage .
Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and : a continuous real function on a closed interval takes every value between its endpoint values.
Continuity from below for measures: for increasing measurable sets, the measure of their union is the supremum of their measures.
Verification
Let have the standard normal law. Its density is , positive everywhere and bounded above by , with total mass one by [F1]. Thus satisfies for every , proving strict increase and continuity. The events and increase to the whole space as integer ; [F6] gives and , hence . Choose finite endpoints bracketing ; [F5] gives a quantile between them, and strict increase gives uniqueness.
The standard normal density is symmetric and has no atoms. Therefore , and the probability of is .
For every candidate mean , is measurable and has standard normal law under , so it is a pivot. The event is exactly ; applying [F4] and [F3] gives exact coverage for every .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on $[a,b]$ takes every value between $f(a)$ and $f(b)$
- Continuity from below for measures
- Confidence sets and coverage
- Pivotal quantities
- Coverage from pivot inversion and exact calibration
- Standard normal and normal laws
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anna Mikusheva, MIT 14.381, Lecture 11: Confidence Sets, §2, PDF pp. 1–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Karl B. Gregory, USC STAT 713, Lecture 14: Confidence Intervals and Sets, slide 8, PDF p. 10 (standard reference, not scraped)