How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lefschetz number of the identity is Euler characteristic
Statement
For every finite CW complex , If is nonempty and contractible, these invariants equal and its identity fixes every point. For the empty complex both invariants are . No AC is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Lefschetz number of a finite CW self-map defines the rational homology trace sum.
Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex defines from the numbers of cells.
Hopf trace formula equates alternating chain and homology traces for bounded finite-dimensional complexes.
Relative homology of consecutive CW skeleta gives one copy of the coefficient group per cell in the corresponding cellular degree.
Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps identifies cellular-map homology with the induced singular homology map.
Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point gives the homology of a point for a nonempty contractible space, with arbitrary abelian coefficients.
Proof
Given: A finite CW complex with cells in dimension .
Its rational cellular chain group has dimension by [F4]. There are finitely many nonzero groups, since has finitely many cells. The identity map preserves every skeleton and induces the identity map of each relative group. Its cellular chain trace in degree is therefore the sum of the diagonal entries equal to one, namely , with trace zero if . By [F5], the induced homology map is the singular homology identity.
Apply [F3] to the identity chain map in step 1.1. Its homology trace sum is by [F1], and its chain trace sum is by [F2]. This proves the equality over directly; no change-of-coefficients identification with integral ranks is needed.
If is nonempty and contractible, [F6] gives its rational homology as that of a point. For completeness, the singular chain group of a point is in each nonnegative degree, with its unique simplex as basis. In positive degree the boundary is multiplication by , which is for even and for odd . Thus in every positive degree the kernel equals the image from the next degree; in degree zero the boundary from degree one is zero. Consequently only survives. The identity therefore has trace in degree zero and no other nonzero traces, so [F1] gives , and step 2.1 gives . Every satisfies ; nonemptiness supplies a fixed point without any choice family. This is consistent with the nonzero-Lefschetz sufficient condition, but the identity's fixed point is already explicit.
If is empty, there are no cells or singular simplices, so both sums are zero. If is a singleton, step 3.1 gives ; for a finite discrete space the same degree-zero identity matrix has one diagonal per point. Missing dimensions and zero cellular groups are covered by step 1.1. Degenerate singular simplices at a point are exactly the generators used in step 3.1 and do not produce unwanted higher homology. The proof is a finite alternating sum, with no infinite endpoint or limiting convention; the boundedness required by [F3] was verified in step 1.1. All basis choices in that theorem are finite, so this example is choice-free.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §2.C (standard reference, not scraped)