How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative homology of consecutive CW skeleta
Statement
For any abelian group , is for and is naturally for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A CW complex and an integer .
Proof
For , the pair is a good pair (collar neighborhoods in the attached disks retract to ), and collapsing gives the wedge . For , is discrete and the same direct-sum calculation follows directly from its singular chain complex.
If there are no -cells, both sides are zero. Otherwise, for , Good pairs and quotient reduced homology and Homology of spheres give one copy of in degree and zero otherwise. A singular simplex has compact image, so A compact subspace of a CW complex meets only finitely many cells makes every chain involve only finitely many wedge summands; the wedge group is therefore the direct sum, not a product. The direct calculation in step 1.1 gives the same conclusion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)