Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Relative homology of consecutive CW skeleta

Statement

For any abelian group G, Hk(Xn,Xn1;G) is 0 for kn and is naturally eαnG for k=n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A CW complex X and an integer n0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n1, the pair (Xn,Xn1) is a good pair (collar neighborhoods in the attached disks retract to Xn1), and collapsing Xn1 gives the wedge αDn/Sn1αSn. For n=0, X0 is discrete and the same direct-sum calculation follows directly from its singular chain complex.

given
2.1

If there are no n-cells, both sides are zero. Otherwise, for n1, Good pairs and quotient reduced homology and Homology of spheres give one copy of G in degree n and zero otherwise. A singular simplex has compact image, so A compact subspace of a CW complex meets only finitely many cells makes every chain involve only finitely many wedge summands; the wedge group is therefore the direct sum, not a product. The direct n=0 calculation in step 1.1 gives the same conclusion.

step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources