How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
CW skeleta are closed and cells form a disjoint partition
Statement
For a CW complex , every skeleton is closed, and is the disjoint union of the open -cells.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A CW complex and its skeleta as in Skeleta, CW subcomplexes, and relative CW complexes.
Proof
Let be the characteristic map of an -cell. If , then . If , this inverse image lies in and equals the inverse image there of the already closed lower skeleton ; induction on makes it closed in and hence in . The weak-topology clause now makes closed in .
The open-cell interiors are disjoint by the cellular partition, and The interior of an attached cell embeds openly in its closure identifies precisely the new interior points after . This gives the asserted difference.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Chapter 0 (standard reference, not scraped)