How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Skeleta, CW subcomplexes, and relative CW complexes
Definition
Write for the union of cells of dimension at most , with . A CW subcomplex is a union of open cells such that, whenever contains an open cell , it contains the whole closure . A relative CW complex is formed from the subcomplex by attaching cells in stages; thus is a cellular inclusion.
Depends on
Used by
- The image of a compact space lies in a finite CW subcomplex Corollary
- Based cellular chains of a universal cover as finite free right group-ring modules Definition
- Connectivity of a CW pair Definition
- Elementary expansions and collapses of finite CW complexes Definition
- Incidence number of two CW cells Definition
- Skeletal mapping telescope of a cw pair Definition
- Unreduced homology theory on cw pairs Definition
- A handle decomposition gives a relative CW complex Lemma
- A low-dimensional disk can be pushed off a higher cell Lemma
- Any ordinary homology theory has a cellular chain complex on a cw pair Lemma
- Cellular attachments with finite boundary support form a CW complex Lemma
- Cellular mapping cylinders and relative cylinders are CW complexes Lemma
- Compact CW images have finite cell support without choice Lemma
- CW quotients and collapse of a contractible subcomplex Lemma
- Finite dimensional axiomatic homology has finite subcomplex support Lemma
- Finite relative homotopy lifting across a weak equivalence Lemma
- High relative cells do not change lower homotopy Lemma
- Homotopy excision for a single relative cell layer Lemma
- The Davis complex as a CW complex: disk cells and the Cayley skeleta Lemma
- Vanishing relative homotopy extends an inverse over cells Lemma
- A CW complex is the colimit of its skeleta in the weak topology Proposition
- A fibration has path lifting and homotopy lifting relative to a subspace Proposition
- Cellular maps induce cellular chain maps Proposition
- CW skeleta are closed and cells form a disjoint partition Proposition
- Euler characteristic is additive for finite CW pairs Proposition
- Relative CW inclusions are cofibrations Proposition
- Cellular approximation for maps of CW pairs Theorem
- Relative cellular homology computes relative singular homology Theorem
- Relative homology of consecutive CW skeleta Theorem
- The Davis complex is simply connected Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Chapter 10 (standard reference, not scraped)