How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative cellular homology computes relative singular homology
Statement
For a CW pair , the quotient cellular complex , whose degree- group is , computes .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A CW pair .
Proof
If , the assertion is the absolute cellular-homology theorem. Suppose . The quotient is a CW complex with one base vertex coming from and exactly the cells of otherwise. In degree zero the reduced cellular group is the augmentation kernel in . It is identified with the quotient degree-zero group by sending each outside vertex generator with coefficient to ; this is an isomorphism even when there are infinitely many vertices, since each chain has finite support. In higher degrees the quotient and reduced groups have identical outside-cell bases. Their differentials agree: deleting an -vertex in the quotient is exactly rewriting it as the base vertex in the augmentation-kernel basis. Thus the two complexes are canonically isomorphic in every degree.
The published CW-quotient comparison A CW quotient induces relative singular homology isomorphisms directly identifies with for nonempty , without assuming a pre-existing neighborhood retraction. Applying Cellular homology computes singular homology to and using step 1.1 gives the claimed groups. Under this identification, the triple connecting maps for the relative skeleta are exactly the quotient cellular differential.
Depends on
Used by
- A contractible relative group-ring complex with a pi-one isomorphism detects a homotopy equivalence Lemma
- Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic Proposition
- The relative handle chain complex computes H_*(W,M₀) and has the intersection matrix as its differential Proposition
- Handle slides are not handle cancellations Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Chapter 13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition A.5 and Section 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)