How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Euler characteristic is additive for finite CW pairs
Statement
For a finite CW pair , . If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite CW subcomplex .
Proof
The cells of are the disjoint union of the cells of and those outside , so the first equality follows by splitting the finite alternating sum.
If is nonempty, has one new -cell (the quotient point) and exactly the cells outside otherwise; its alternating count gives the second formula.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)