How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Euler–Poincare formula for finite CW complexes
Statement
For a finite CW complex, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite free integral cellular chain complex of .
Proof
Rank-nullity in each degree gives .
Alternating and summing cancels each boundary rank with its neighboring occurrence. The left side is Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex, and Cellular homology computes singular homology identifies the remaining ranks with singular homology.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Theorem 2.44 (standard reference, not scraped)