How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Euler characteristic of a compact manifold
Definition
Let be a compact smooth -manifold, possibly with boundary (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts in the boundaryless case, Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary in the boundary case). Its Euler characteristic is the alternating sum of the rational Betti numbers of the singular homology of (The singular chain complex and singular homology, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). The empty manifold has , the empty sum. The sum is finite because for every and for ; that finiteness is proved on this page in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗, which is why it is recorded as the well-definedness pointer rather than assumed here. The definition itself uses no orientation and no choice of field or coefficient system.
When has a finite CW model, agrees with its cell-count Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex): the finite rational cellular complex has one generator per cell, and alternating rank-nullity cancels boundary dimensions. Cellular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology) therefore identifies that cell count with the rational Betti alternating sum. The integral Euler-Poincare formula (Euler–Poincare formula for finite CW complexes) gives the same count. The relative version is proved in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗. The cited well-definedness proposition assumes the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) to obtain an excellent Morse function. The formula for makes no selection of auxiliary data.
Depends on
- The singular chain complex and singular homology
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers
- Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
- Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary
- Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex
- Euler–Poincare formula for finite CW complexes
- Cellular homology computes singular homology
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- A nowhere-zero vector field forces zero Euler characteristic Corollary
- Closed odd-dimensional manifolds have zero Euler characteristic Corollary
- The Euler number of the tangent bundle is the Euler characteristic Corollary
- The Lefschetz number of the identity is the Euler characteristic Corollary
- The Morse critical-point sum is the Euler characteristic Corollary
- An interval has nonzero Euler characteristic despite being odd-dimensional Counterexample
- An inward radial field violates the outward boundary formula Counterexample
- A nowhere-zero vector field on an odd sphere Example
- A torus translation has zero Lefschetz number and no fixed points Example
- The hairy-ball theorem for even spheres Example
- The outward radial field on a disk Example
- The index sum of an outward field on an even-dimensional manifold Lemma
- Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic Proposition
- The outward boundary hypothesis cannot be replaced by nonzero on the boundary Remark
- Converse Poincare-Hopf for nowhere-zero fields Theorem
- Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds Theorem
- Poincare-Hopf with outward-pointing boundary Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John W. Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (complete 76-page PDF, including the appendix Classifying 1-manifolds) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology (Prentice-Hall 1974; complete PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)