Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler characteristic of a compact manifold

Definition

Let M be a compact smooth n-manifold, possibly with boundary (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts in the boundaryless case, Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary in the boundary case). Its Euler characteristic is χ(M):=∑i=0n(−1)idim⁡QHi(M;Q)∈Z, the alternating sum of the rational Betti numbers of the singular homology of M (The singular chain complex and singular homology, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). The empty manifold has χ(∅)=0, the empty sum. The sum is finite because dim⁡QHi(M;Q)<∞ for every i and Hi(M;Q)=0 for i>n; that finiteness is proved on this page in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗, which is why it is recorded as the well-definedness pointer rather than assumed here. The definition itself uses no orientation and no choice of field or coefficient system.

When M has a finite CW model, χ(M) agrees with its cell-count Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex): the finite rational cellular complex has one generator per cell, and alternating rank-nullity cancels boundary dimensions. Cellular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology) therefore identifies that cell count with the rational Betti alternating sum. The integral Euler-Poincare formula (Euler–Poincare formula for finite CW complexes) gives the same count. The relative version is proved in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗. The cited well-definedness proposition assumes the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) to obtain an excellent Morse function. The formula for χ makes no selection of auxiliary data.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources