Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a compact smooth n-manifold, possibly with boundary.

(i) Each dim⁡QHi(M;Q) is finite and Hi(M;Q)=0 for i>n, so χ(M) of Euler characteristic of a compact manifold is a well-defined integer.

(ii) If A⊆M is a compact smooth submanifold, possibly with boundary, and (M,A) is homotopy equivalent as a pair to a finite relative CW pair with ck relative k-cells, then χ(M)=χ(A)+∑k(−1)kck=χ(A)+∑k(−1)kdim⁡QHk(M,A;Q).

(iii) If M=M1∪NM2 with M1,M2 compact smooth submanifolds, possibly with boundary, N=M1∩M2 a common compact smooth submanifold, and the inclusions N↪Mi cofibrations, then χ(M)=χ(M1)+χ(M2)−χ(N).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a compact smooth n-manifold M, possibly with boundary.

[F1]

The double DM is a closed smooth n-manifold. Its continuous folding map q([x,+])=q([x,−])=x is well defined on the quotient and is a retraction onto the first labelled copy, with q∘i=id⁡M (The double of a smooth manifold with boundary, The double has a well-defined smooth structure).

[F2]

For a closed smooth manifold with an excellent Morse function, the handle chain complex of The handle chain complex computes singular homology is a complex of finite-dimensional Q-vector spaces with exactly mk(f) generators in degree k whose homology is Hk(M;Q); hence those homology spaces are finite-dimensional and vanish above the dimension (Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, The singular chain complex and singular homology).

[F3]

Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology with any coefficients, and the long exact sequence of a pair and the Mayer-Vietoris sequence are long exact sequences of Q-vector spaces (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology, Long exact sequence of a pair, Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology).

[F4]

Alternating-dimension lemma: for a long exact sequence ⋯→Ak→Bk→Ck→Ak−1→⋯ of finite-dimensional vector spaces vanishing outside a finite range, one has ∑k(−1)k(dim⁡Ak−dim⁡Bk+dim⁡Ck)=0, and the intermediate spaces are finite-dimensional with the same vanishing range (Rank bookkeeping for a long exact sequence of finite-dimensional vector spaces, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).

[F5]

For a CW pair, relative cellular chains have one generator per relative cell and compute relative singular homology (Relative cellular homology computes relative singular homology). For a finite chain complex, writing Zk=ker⁡dk and Bk=im⁡dk+1 gives dim⁡Ck=dim⁡Hk+dim⁡Bk+dim⁡Bk−1; alternating summation cancels the boundary dimensions. Thus the alternating relative cell count equals the alternating rational relative Betti sum, even when the base subcomplex itself has infinitely many cells.

[F6]

The smooth spaces Mi,N in (iii) are CGWH under the assumed AC (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type), so the cofibration interface applies. For a closed cofibration A↪X, the homotopy extension property supplies a retraction X×I→X×{0}∪A×I (Cofibrations are characterized by a retraction of the mapping cylinder strip).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For (i), the empty case is immediate. Otherwise the folding retraction [F1] gives q∗i∗=id⁡ on rational homology, so Hi(M;Q) embeds as a direct summand of Hi(DM;Q). Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, choose an excellent Morse function on the closed double and apply [F2]. Its handle complex is finite-dimensional and concentrated in degrees 0,…,n; its homology, and hence the summand for M, is finite-dimensional and zero above n. This establishes well-definedness without presupposing χ(M).

1.2F6construct

For (iii), replace the glued space by the double mapping cylinder P=M1∪N×{0}(N×I)∪N×{1}M2. We verify that collapsing the cylinder is a homotopy equivalence P→M. Let C=M1∪N(N×I), with collapse f:C→M1. By [F6] extend the track H(n,t)=[n,t] and the initial inclusion of M1 to H:M1×I→C. Set j=H1, so j(n)=[n,1]. Then fH joins id⁡M1 to fj relative to N. On C, use H(x,t) for x∈M1 and [n,s+t(1−s)] for [n,s] in the cylinder; the formulas agree at s=0, define a homotopy from id⁡C to jf, and fix the free end N×{1}. Gluing these maps and homotopies to the identity of M2 proves the asserted equivalence. The compact subspaces Mi are closed in M, so their pushout topology is the topology of M1∪M2=M by finite closed pasting.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

For (ii), step 1.1 applies to both M and A. In the pair long exact sequence [F3], Hk(M,A;Q) lies between a quotient of Hk(M;Q) and a subspace of Hk−1(A;Q); it is therefore finite-dimensional and vanishes outside a finite range. Alternating summation of this exact sequence gives χ(M)−χ(A)=∑k(−1)kdim⁡Hk(M,A;Q) by [F4], applied after cyclically relabelling the three terms if necessary. The given equivalence of pairs induces isomorphisms on these relative groups: the absolute homology maps are isomorphisms by [F3], and exactness of the pair sequences gives injectivity and surjectivity of the relative maps by lifting and subtracting successive neighbouring classes. Now [F5] computes the relative alternating sum as ∑k(−1)kck, proving both equalities without requiring a finite absolute CW structure on A.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The open subsets U=M1∪(N×[0,2/3)) and V=M2∪(N×(1/3,1]) cover P. They deformation retract to M1,M2, while U∩V=N×(1/3,2/3) retracts to N. Thus [F3] and step 1.2 give a Mayer–Vietoris sequence with homology terms those of N, M1⊔M2 and M. All terms are finite-dimensional and vanish outside a finite range by step 1.1. Applying [F4] at t=−1 gives χ(N)−χ(M1)−χ(M2)+χ(M)=0, as required.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Euler characteristic of a compact manifold.

Dependency tree · two levels

121 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources