How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vector Field Index Euler Characteristic and Poincare Hopf
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bocksteins Steenrod Squares and Cohomology Operations
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Chern–Weil Theory and Characteristic Forms
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cup Cap Cross Products and Cohomology Rings
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Gradient Like Vector Fields and Morse Trajectories
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Handle Decompositions Duality and Rearrangement
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integration of Forms and the General Stokes Theorem
- Intersection Pairings Self Intersection and Euler Classes
- Kunneth Exactness and Splittings over Principal Ideal Domains
- Leray–Hirsch, the Thom Isomorphism, and Gysin Sequences
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Local Coefficients, Twisted Homology, and Duality
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices
- Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity
- Morse Inequalities and the Handle Chain Complex
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Obstruction Theory, Postnikov Towers, and Classifying Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Orientations Poincare Lefschetz and Alexander Duality
- Oriented and Mod Two Intersection Numbers
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spectral Sequences
- Stiefel Whitney and Euler Classes by Universal Constructions
- Sublevel Deformation and the Handle Attachment Theorem
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The de Rham Theorem and Degree
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Serre Spectral Sequence and Applications
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
2 · Summary
The page develops the local index of an isolated zero of a smooth vector field, its chart and ball invariance, the determinant formula for nondegenerate zeros, additivity under transverse perturbation, and the zero-section intersection interpretation that bridges to the Euler class. It then proves the Poincare-Hopf index theorems for closed manifolds and for compact manifolds with an outward-pointing boundary field, the converse existence theorem for nowhere-zero fields by cancellation of opposite zeros, and the corollaries that fix the Morse gradient signs, the odd-dimensional vanishing of the Euler characteristic, and the evaluation of the Euler number of the tangent bundle.
Dimension restrictions are stated in each item; the index and Poincare-Hopf theorems cover every dimension . The zero-dimensional case of the sphere degree used by the index is supplied on this page so that the cases of the index, the Gauss-degree lemma and the Poincare-Hopf theorems are covered by the same conventions as the higher-dimensional ones. The Axiom of Choice supplies the excellent Morse functions used to establish homological finiteness and evaluate the index sum. The embedding, tube, Stokes, perturbation and geodesic ball-selection arguments use countable choice. Trivializations for degree computations use matching base and fibre orientations, and the reflected field is doubled using its flow collar.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Euler characteristic of a compact manifold
Definition
Let be a compact smooth -manifold, possibly with boundary (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts in the boundaryless case, Smooth charts, atlases, and structures with boundary in the boundary case). Its Euler characteristic is the alternating sum of the rational Betti numbers of the singular homology of (The singular chain complex and singular homology, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers). The empty manifold has , the empty sum. The sum is finite because for every and for ; that finiteness is proved on this page in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗, which is why it is recorded as the well-definedness pointer rather than assumed here. The definition itself uses no orientation and no choice of field or coefficient system.
When has a finite CW model, agrees with its cell-count Euler characteristic (Euler characteristic of a finite CW complex): the finite rational cellular complex has one generator per cell, and alternating rank-nullity cancels boundary dimensions. Cellular homology (Cellular homology computes singular homology) therefore identifies that cell count with the rational Betti alternating sum. The integral Euler-Poincare formula (Euler–Poincare formula for finite CW complexes) gives the same count. The relative version is proved in Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic ↗. The cited well-definedness proposition assumes the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) to obtain an excellent Morse function. The formula for makes no selection of auxiliary data.
Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact smooth -manifold, possibly with boundary.
(i) Each is finite and for , so of Euler characteristic of a compact manifold is a well-defined integer.
(ii) If is a compact smooth submanifold, possibly with boundary, and is homotopy equivalent as a pair to a finite relative CW pair with relative -cells, then
(iii) If with compact smooth submanifolds, possibly with boundary, a common compact smooth submanifold, and the inclusions cofibrations, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a compact smooth -manifold , possibly with boundary.
The double is a closed smooth -manifold. Its continuous folding map is well defined on the quotient and is a retraction onto the first labelled copy, with (The double of a smooth manifold with boundary, The double has a well-defined smooth structure).
For a closed smooth manifold with an excellent Morse function, the handle chain complex of The handle chain complex computes singular homology is a complex of finite-dimensional -vector spaces with exactly generators in degree whose homology is ; hence those homology spaces are finite-dimensional and vanish above the dimension (Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, The singular chain complex and singular homology).
Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology with any coefficients, and the long exact sequence of a pair and the Mayer-Vietoris sequence are long exact sequences of -vector spaces (Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology, Long exact sequence of a pair, Mayer–Vietoris sequence in singular homology).
Alternating-dimension lemma: for a long exact sequence of finite-dimensional vector spaces vanishing outside a finite range, one has , and the intermediate spaces are finite-dimensional with the same vanishing range (Rank bookkeeping for a long exact sequence of finite-dimensional vector spaces, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, The rationals as equivalence classes of pairs of integers).
For a CW pair, relative cellular chains have one generator per relative cell and compute relative singular homology (Relative cellular homology computes relative singular homology). For a finite chain complex, writing and gives ; alternating summation cancels the boundary dimensions. Thus the alternating relative cell count equals the alternating rational relative Betti sum, even when the base subcomplex itself has infinitely many cells.
The smooth spaces in (iii) are CGWH under the assumed AC (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type), so the cofibration interface applies. For a closed cofibration , the homotopy extension property supplies a retraction (Cofibrations are characterized by a retraction of the mapping cylinder strip).
Proof
For (i), the empty case is immediate. Otherwise the folding retraction [F1] gives on rational homology, so embeds as a direct summand of . Under the assumed Axiom of Choice, choose an excellent Morse function on the closed double and apply [F2]. Its handle complex is finite-dimensional and concentrated in degrees ; its homology, and hence the summand for , is finite-dimensional and zero above . This establishes well-definedness without presupposing .
For (iii), replace the glued space by the double mapping cylinder . We verify that collapsing the cylinder is a homotopy equivalence . Let , with collapse . By [F6] extend the track and the initial inclusion of to . Set , so . Then joins to relative to . On , use for and for in the cylinder; the formulas agree at , define a homotopy from to , and fix the free end . Gluing these maps and homotopies to the identity of proves the asserted equivalence. The compact subspaces are closed in , so their pushout topology is the topology of by finite closed pasting.
For (ii), step 1.1 applies to both and . In the pair long exact sequence [F3], lies between a quotient of and a subspace of ; it is therefore finite-dimensional and vanishes outside a finite range. Alternating summation of this exact sequence gives by [F4], applied after cyclically relabelling the three terms if necessary. The given equivalence of pairs induces isomorphisms on these relative groups: the absolute homology maps are isomorphisms by [F3], and exactness of the pair sequences gives injectivity and surjectivity of the relative maps by lifting and subtracting successive neighbouring classes. Now [F5] computes the relative alternating sum as , proving both equalities without requiring a finite absolute CW structure on .
The open subsets and cover . They deformation retract to , while retracts to . Thus [F3] and step 1.2 give a Mayer–Vietoris sequence with homology terms those of , and . All terms are finite-dimensional and vanish outside a finite range by step 1.1. Applying [F4] at gives , as required.
The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere
Definition
Write for the -sphere (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ) and orient it by the boundary orientation of the interval (Induced boundary orientation): the point carries the sign and the point the sign , since an orientation of a -manifold is a sign at each point (Oriented smooth manifolds and oriented charts). Let be a finite oriented -manifold, that is, a finite set together with a sign for every (Oriented smooth manifolds and oriented charts); it is balanced when For a balanced and a map — every map is continuous because is discrete and is discrete — define the reduced degree the signed count of the values divided by two, where the values are read in . This is well defined: since takes only the two values , balance gives , hence is even, and replacing by changes the sign of exactly as changing an orientation changes the ordinary degree (Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds).
The case with the standard orientation above is balanced, and then This is the induced map on the reduced group generated by the difference of the two point classes (Reduced homology theory and augmentation): the identity has reduced degree , the antipodal map , and the two constant maps . It is the scalar replacement for the fundamental-class degree of Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds, whose scalar definition is stated only for nonempty connected closed oriented manifolds and therefore does not apply to a source as disconnected as .
The motivating balanced sources are boundaries: if is a compact oriented smooth -manifold and carries the induced boundary orientation, then (Oriented boundary counts of a compact oriented 1-manifold cancel), so is balanced and every map has a reduced degree. No choice principle is used in the definition; the cited boundary-count lemma assumes .
Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative
Statement
Let be a balanced oriented finite -manifold, so that every map has a reduced degree, and let be a map (The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).
(i) If is continuous and , then for every ; in particular .
(ii) If is any map and denotes its reduced degree as a self-map of , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A balanced oriented finite -manifold with and a map .
is oriented by the boundary orientation of : the point has sign and has sign . A reduced degree is defined only for a balanced source: , and then for a map . For itself this reads (The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).
carries the subspace topology (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). The interval is order-convex, hence connected, and a product of connected spaces is connected (A subset of is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval, A product of connected spaces is connected in the product topology, and that argument is a theorem of ZF; for an infinite index set it is the assertion that the product of nonempty spaces is nonempty that uses the Axiom of Choice); in particular every is connected.
In the two singletons are open for the subspace topology: and (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of , Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). A continuous map from a connected space into is therefore constant: the preimages of the two disjoint open singletons would otherwise separate the domain.
Proof
Proof technique: direct; split the composition law by the three possible reduced degrees of the self-map .
The product is the disjoint union of the connected subsets , one for each ; a continuous map from a connected space into is constant, so is constant on each , hence for all and ; equal maps have equal reduced degree, which proves (i).
Suppose is not constant. A map is determined by the pair , so a nonconstant sends and to different values; hence is either the identity, with and for both , or the antipodal map , with , so that for all ; then and, by linearity of the defining signed count, , while by [F1], the identity and the antipodal map having reduced degrees and ; thus .
If is constant with value , then is the constant map and by balance, while by [F1]; hence again , which completes (ii).
Isolated zero and local index of a vector field
Definition
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a smooth -manifold without boundary, , and let be a smooth vector field on (A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts). A point is an isolated zero of when and some chart around contains no other zero of ; equivalently, the set of zeros of has as an isolated point in a chart around (Manifold charts, coordinate domains, and coordinate functions).
For an isolated zero choose a smooth chart of the smooth structure of with and write for the chart representative of (The induced tangent bundle chart). Since is an isolated zero there is with on , so the normalized field is a continuous map . The local index of at is the degree of Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds computed with the standard orientations of the two copies of , for .
For the same formula is read in dimension zero: the sphere parametrizes by , and the displayed map is a map whose reduced degree in the sense of The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere is declared to be the index, This case is well posed for every : the two signs of on and on are each constant, because is continuous and nowhere zero on either half-interval, so the two values do not depend on ; for the value is independent of by the homotopy on the zero-free annulus (Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy). The value is also independent of the smooth chart and admissible radius, and of trivializations whose fibre orientation matches the chosen base orientation (The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization ↗); in particular no orientation of is required, because a chart change multiplies both the source and the target orientation by the same sign, and the case is the same statement read on the -sphere. Every statement on this page assumes ; the index is a signed integer, .
The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a smooth -manifold without boundary, , let have an isolated zero , and let be smooth charts of the given smooth structure centered at , with admissible radii as in Isolated zero and local index of a vector field. Then the maps have the same degree, using reduced degree when . Thus the local index is independent of chart and radius. On a coordinate ball it is also unchanged by a smooth fibre trivialization preserving the coordinate orientation. Equivalently, base and fibre orientations must be chosen consistently; reversing only the fibre orientation reverses the degree. No orientation of is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth vector field on the smooth -manifold with an isolated zero , smooth charts , centered at , and admissible radii .
The chart representatives are related by the chain rule: with defined near and , for near (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps, Isolated zero and local index of a vector field). In particular is an isomorphism with (The differential of a diffeomorphism is an isomorphism), and , , for .
Degree facts for the normalized sphere maps of : homotopic smooth maps have the same degree (Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy), and for such maps (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds). A diffeomorphism of has degree or according as it preserves or reverses the orientation (Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism).
For reduced degrees are used: the balanced source gives , and for maps of (The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).
For an invertible linear , the normalized linear map is a diffeomorphism of with inverse , and its local orientation sign at every is : choosing a positively oriented basis of , the outward normal of the ball is the first basis vector, so the induced map on the tangent space has the orientation sign of there, namely . Hence for by [F2], and the same formula holds for the reduced degree at , since on by [F3].
Proof
Within either chart, varying the radius through positive admissible radii gives the homotopy , since its numerator is nonzero. Its degree is constant by [F2] or [F3]. Shrink both radii to a common such that the transition and its inverse are defined and all points used below lie in a zero-free punctured coordinate ball.
Put , and . The normalized -field is by [F1]. Since tends uniformly to the invertible matrix , interpolation of this matrix to stays invertible for small , giving . The radial homotopy stays in the zero-free punctured ball; hence joins this last map to , where . Finally uniformly, so normalized convex interpolation gives . Thus .
Multiplicativity and [F4] now give , also for reduced degree at . Step 1.1 restores the original radii, proving equality of indices. This does not assert that and themselves are homotopic: for and , they are the distinct constant maps of , both of degree zero.
On a coordinate ball an orientation-preserving trivialization changes components to with . Contracting to through gives a nonzero homotopy on the sphere. The resulting degree is by [F4]. A negative determinant instead multiplies it by , which is compensated if the base orientation is also reversed. These are exactly the consistent orientation conventions in the statement.
Nondegenerate zero of a vector field
Definition
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a smooth -manifold, a smooth vector field on and a zero of (A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle). View as a smooth section (Smoothness of a section is equivalent to smooth local components). The zero section is a smooth embedding (The zero section is a smooth embedding), so its differential is injective (The differential of a smooth map), and the vertical quotient at is Since is a section, both and are right inverses of the projection ; hence the class of in is the vertical derivative read through the canonical identification : explicitly, the difference takes values in the vertical space , and is that difference followed by the canonical isomorphism from the vertical space to . In an induced tangent-bundle chart over a chart with the section reads and corresponds to the ordinary derivative of the chart representative (The induced tangent bundle chart, Local and global frames of a vector bundle); a change of chart conjugates by an isomorphism, so invertibility and the determinant are independent of the chart (The tangent bundle as a disjoint union).
The zero is nondegenerate when is invertible. A nondegenerate zero is isolated: in a chart, and is invertible, so is a diffeomorphism near by the inverse function theorem (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds) and its only zero near is itself. In particular a nondegenerate zero is an isolated zero and has no other zero in some neighbourhood of . The vertical derivative itself requires no further choice once the smooth tangent-bundle structure is supplied.
The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a smooth -manifold, , let be a smooth vector field and let be a nondegenerate zero of (Nondegenerate zero of a vector field). Then In particular every nondegenerate zero has index or .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth -manifold , a smooth vector field and a nondegenerate zero of .
In a smooth chart of the given smooth structure with the chart representative vanishes at and its derivative there is the vertical derivative: , corresponds to under the chart trivialization, and invertible is equivalent to invertible; moreover with and (Nondegenerate zero of a vector field, The induced tangent bundle chart).
The index is computed by the normalized field on a small sphere, with the standard orientations (), and for by the reduced degree of the induced map (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field); the value does not depend on the chart or the admissible radius (The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization).
The normalized linear map of an invertible is a diffeomorphism of whose local orientation sign is , hence ; for this is the reduced degree of . Degree is invariant under homotopies of maps of () and, for , under homotopies of maps of (Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds, Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy, Degree is multiplicative under composition, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).
Proof
Take a smooth chart as in [F1] and put , so with and invertible; write and with . For and the vector with has norm at least , so is a homotopy from the normalized linear map to the normalized chart field .
For homotopy invariance gives , and for the same homotopy is one of maps , so by [F3] the reduced degrees agree and again ; since corresponds to by [F1], and have the same sign and , because is invertible.
The local index is additive under a transverse perturbation
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a smooth -manifold, , let be a smooth vector field with an isolated zero at , and let be an embedded closed ball with , on , and no zero of in other than (such a ball exists in a chart around ).
(i) Choose an orientation of and a smooth trivialization of preserving that orientation, and orient as the boundary of ; then equals the degree of from to (the reduced degree for ).
(ii) If is a smooth vector field on with outside and only nondegenerate zeros in , then .
(iii) Consequently every isolated zero can be perturbed, supported in an arbitrarily small ball around it, to finitely many nondegenerate zeros with the same index sum.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth vector field on the smooth -manifold with an isolated zero , and a sufficiently small embedded closed ball with and no other zero of in .
The index of the isolated zero is the degree of the normalized field on the boundary of a small ball in a chart, with the reduced degree for ; it is independent of chart and radius, and of trivializations with matching base and fibre orientations (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field, The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization).
Hopf's boundary lemma: for a compact smooth -manifold with boundary and a smooth field on with only isolated zeros and on , the sum of the indices over the zeros of equals the degree of from to with the boundary orientation (the reduced degree for ) (The index sum of an outward field is the Gauss degree, Induced boundary orientation).
Nondegenerate zeros have index (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
The set of regular values of a smooth map is dense and has null complement; in particular there are regular values of the chart representative arbitrarily close to (but different from) (Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds, Regular values have null complement and are dense).
There is a smooth bump on the chart that equals on a smaller ball and is supported in a slightly larger one (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs), and a chart around trivializes over (The induced tangent bundle chart, Embedded smooth submanifolds with boundary).
Proof
Choose a smooth parametrization and pull back the field as on : this is a smooth field on the compact manifold with boundary, with the single zero and on ; [F2] applied to gives , and this degree is the degree of on in the induced trivialization; any other orientation-compatible trivialization has the same degree by the matrix-contraction argument of [F1]; hence (i).
For (ii), the same computation applies to the transported field on : its zeros in are and it agrees with on , so [F2] gives by step 1.1; the indices are transported back by [F1], and each equals by [F3].
For (iii), let be an arbitrarily small embedded closed ball around with no other zero of in its interior and let be a chart on a neighbourhood of with ; choose a smooth radial bump equal to on a ball around and supported in a slightly larger ball with , , and containing no zero of except , and by [F4] choose a regular value of with smaller than the (positive) minimum of on the compact collar . Then (read in the chart) equals outside , is nowhere zero on the collar , and on has the zeros , a finite set of nondegenerate points because is a regular value; all these zeros lie in , so (ii) applies and gives , with each index by [F3].
The index of a zero is its zero-section intersection number
Statement
Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a closed oriented smooth -manifold, , and give the orientation which along the zero section is the direct sum of the horizontal (tangent) orientation of the base and the vertical (fibre) orientation, first factor first (Product orientations, The tangent bundle as a disjoint union), orient both submanifolds by their projections to , and let be the zero section (The zero section is a smooth embedding) and let be the graph of a smooth vector field transverse to , so that the zeros of are nondegenerate. Then, with the oriented intersection number of The oriented intersection number, and at each zero the local oriented intersection sign of The local oriented intersection sign satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed oriented smooth -manifold , the tangent bundle with its horizontal-then-vertical orientation along the zero section, and a smooth field whose graph is transverse to the zero section.
and are closed embedded -submanifolds of the boundaryless -manifold with complementary dimensions, and for a transverse pair with one factor compact the intersection is finite (The zero section is a smooth embedding, Transverse embedded submanifolds, Compact transverse complementary intersections are finite).
For a compact oriented -manifold without boundary , an oriented -manifold and a closed oriented embedded -submanifold with and transverse inclusion, the oriented intersection number is the finite sum of the local signs of The local oriented intersection sign, with the product orientation on the ordered sum of tangent spaces, first factor first (The oriented intersection number).
Local model of the intersection: over a chart of in which is trivialized as , the zero section is and the graph is ; at a point the tangent spaces are and , and the determinant comparing the ordered product with the ambient horizontal-then-vertical orientation is : the relevant matrix is block-triangular with identity and blocks, exactly as in the push-off computation of Normal push-off zeros are the self-intersection points (The induced tangent bundle chart, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
The zeros of are exactly the intersection points of with , and is transverse to exactly when is invertible at every zero, equivalently when every zero is nondegenerate; a nondegenerate zero has index (Nondegenerate zero of a vector field, The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero).
Proof
Write . Since , the intersection points are the zeros of ; at such a point the transversality of to is equivalent to the surjectivity of (the tangent spaces are the horizontal space and the graph of ), so transversality means invertibility of at every zero, i.e. nondegeneracy; by [F1] the intersection is finite, and by [F4] each intersection point carries index .
At a zero , the local sign is computed in the chart of [F3] as the determinant sign of the block-triangular matrix with diagonal blocks and , hence equals ; this proves the pointwise identity and, summing over the finitely many intersection points with [F2], also . The countable choice hypothesis is inherited from the transverse-representative selection in the definition of the oriented intersection number for non-transverse maps (The oriented intersection number, The oriented intersection number is homotopy invariant), although for the transverse pair considered here the sum is choice-free.
Negation scales the local index by
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a smooth -manifold, , and let be a smooth vector field with an isolated zero at (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field). Then has an isolated zero at and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth vector field on the smooth -manifold with an isolated zero at .
The index is computed by the normalized field on a small sphere: for a chart with representative and admissible , where , the degree being the ordinary one for and the reduced degree for (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field).
The antipodal map of has degree for ; the reduced degree of the antipodal map of is (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps, The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).
Degree is multiplicative under composition of maps of for , and reduced degree is multiplicative under composition for maps into (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).
Proof
The field vanishes exactly where does, so is an isolated zero of ; in the same chart , so its normalized map is , where is the antipodal map of and is the normalized map of .
For multiplicativity of the degree under composition gives by [F2], and for the same computation with reduced degrees gives , since for .
The index sum of an outward field is the Gauss degree
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a compact smooth -dimensional submanifold with boundary, (Embedded smooth submanifolds with boundary), and let be a smooth vector field on with only isolated zeros and on . Then, summing the componentwise degrees over the components of with the boundary orientation (Induced boundary orientation), For the right-hand side is read as the reduced degree of the map : the oriented boundary of a compact oriented -manifold is balanced (Oriented boundary counts of a compact oriented 1-manifold cancel), so the reduced degree of The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere applies. If in addition points strictly outward along (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors), the right-hand side equals for the Gauss map sending to the outward unit normal. In particular the index sum is independent of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact smooth -manifold with boundary , oriented by the ambient orientation of , and a smooth field on with on and only isolated zeros.
The zeros of are finitely many: the zero set is closed, and an infinite closed discrete subset of the compact space would have an accumulation point at which continuity gives while every neighbourhood of contains other zeros, contradicting isolatedness. (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field)
The index of an isolated zero is the degree of on a small sphere around the zero, with the standard orientations, and for the reduced degree of that map (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field, The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).
For , a regular value exists by Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds and Regular values have null complement and are dense. For a proper smooth map from a nonempty connected closed oriented -manifold and a top form on , where the degree is the closed-manifold degree of Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds, equal to the compact-support cohomological degree of Regular-value formula for degree, and where a normalized volume form with integral one exists (Positive volume form on an oriented manifold, Integral of a compactly supported top form, Degree is well defined and independent of the normalized top form).
Under , manifold Stokes holds for a compact oriented manifold with boundary and a smooth -form : , the boundary carrying the induced boundary orientation (The general Stokes theorem, Induced boundary orientation).
For : consists of finitely many points with signs , and ; the reduced degree of a map is (Oriented boundary counts of a compact oriented 1-manifold cancel, The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).
If is strictly outward on , with outward unit normal (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors), then pointwise, so is a homotopy from to ; homotopic maps have equal degree, and for a homotopy is constant in the time variable, so the reduced degrees agree (Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).
Proof
By [F1] the zeros of are finite; choose pairwise disjoint closed coordinate balls around them, so small that on and , and let , a compact oriented -manifold with boundary on which the normalized field is smooth. Its boundary is , where each carries, as a piece of , the orientation opposite to the boundary orientation of the removed ball , since the outward normals of and of are opposite along .
For choose a volume form on with and apply [F4] to : since , . Evaluating the boundary integral componentwise with [F3] gives , because each small sphere is mapped by with degree in its own boundary orientation by [F2] and therefore contributes to .
For use instead the -form on with , so that and ; Stokes gives , and each removed pair contributes with the orientation of step 1.1 by [F2], so by [F5], the claimed formula; this and step 2.1 prove the first assertion in both dimensions, and with it the index sum depends only on the boundary values of the normalized field.
If is strictly outward, [F6] gives a homotopy from to the Gauss map , so their degrees agree and the right-hand side equals ; since does not involve , the index sum is independent of the choice of the outward field.
Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a closed smooth -manifold, , and let be a smooth vector field on with only isolated zeros (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field). Then with as in Euler characteristic of a compact manifold. In particular the sum is independent of and vanishes over the empty zero set; for disconnected the statement is applied componentwise.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth -manifold , , and a smooth field on with only isolated zeros.
The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) is used only through the existence of an excellent Morse function; the embedding, tube and perturbation arguments use (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The zeros of are finite, and by The local index is additive under a transverse perturbation(iii) each zero can be perturbed, supported in an arbitrarily small ball around it, to finitely many nondegenerate zeros with the same index sum; a nondegenerate zero has index (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
Hopf's boundary lemma: for a compact smooth -manifold with boundary and a smooth field on with only isolated zeros and strictly outward on , the Gauss map of the boundary; the right-hand side is the degree of the normalized field, independent of (The index sum of an outward field is the Gauss degree).
Every smooth -manifold admits a proper smooth embedding into (The weak Whitney proper embedding theorem), a closed embedded submanifold of has a tubular neighbourhood given by normal addition with a positive radius function, and a smooth nearest-point retraction onto it (The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem, A closed Euclidean submanifold has a smooth neighborhood retraction).
For a Riemannian metric and an excellent Morse function on (Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, Morse functions and excellent Morse functions), the field vanishes exactly at the critical points (The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points), all of which are nondegenerate, and a critical point of index contributes (A Morse gradient zero contributes to the index, Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex).
For a closed manifold, the alternating sum of over the critical points of a Morse function equals , and is additive over disjoint unions (Morse Euler characteristic identity, The singular homology of a disjoint union is the direct sum).
Proof
Reduction to nondegenerate zeros: by [F1] the zeros of are finite, and in pairwise disjoint small balls around them may be replaced by fields whose zeros in those balls are nondegenerate with the same index sum; the replacements paste smoothly with the unchanged field outside and produce a smooth field on with only nondegenerate zeros and . Since the right-hand side does not involve , it suffices to prove the identity for fields with nondegenerate zeros.
An invariant: embed properly in with by [F3] and let be a closed tubular neighbourhood given by normal addition (radius uniform by compactness of ) with nearest-point retraction . Define for ; the two summands are orthogonal, since and . Hence iff and : the zeros of are exactly the zeros of , viewed in . On we have and the outward normal is , so : the field points strictly outward, and in particular on . At a zero the derivative of as a map on is in the splitting (the map has derivative the orthogonal projection onto the normal space), so and by the determinant sign formula. Hopf's boundary lemma [F2] applied to therefore gives a number depending only on (through its embedding and tube), not on .
Evaluation: choose an excellent Morse function by [A1] and [F4] and a Riemannian metric , and take , a field with only nondegenerate zeros. By [F4] each critical point contributes , so the invariant of step 2.1 equals by [F5]; combining with steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives for the original field , which is therefore independent of and equal to when has no zeros.
If is disconnected, apply the identity on each component and add: the index sum splits over the components, and is additive over disjoint unions by [F5], so the same identity holds; the empty zero set is included (the empty alternating sum is ).
A nowhere-zero vector field forces zero Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a closed smooth -manifold, , and suppose admits a smooth vector field with no zeros at all. Then (Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth -manifold with a nowhere-zero smooth vector field .
A vector field with no zeros has only isolated zeros, so Poincare-Hopf applies: (Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds, Isolated zero and local index of a vector field).
Proof
The zero set of is empty by hypothesis, so it consists of isolated zeros vacuously and the hypothesis of [F1] is satisfied; the index sum is the empty sum .
Poincare-Hopf [F1] now gives .
A Morse gradient zero contributes to the index
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.
Let be a closed smooth -manifold, , and let be a Morse function (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions), let be a Riemannian metric on (Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold) and let be a critical point of of index (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex). Then has a nondegenerate zero at with
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth manifold , a Morse function , a Riemannian metric and a critical point of of Morse index .
The gradient is a smooth vector field on and it vanishes exactly at the critical points of (The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points).
In coordinates, differentiating the gradient formula at a critical point gives , because kills the derivatives of the inverse metric. Thus the linearization (vertical derivative) of is the Hessian bilinear form , read through ; the critical Hessian of a Morse function is nondegenerate with negative and positive entries in its inertia normal form, so the linearization is invertible and is a nondegenerate zero of (The intrinsic Hessian of a smooth function at a critical point, At a critical point, the intrinsic Hessian agrees with the Levi-Civita Hessian, Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
A nondegenerate zero has index equal to the sign of the determinant of its linearization (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero), the sign of the determinant of a nondegenerate symmetric form with negative and positive entries in its inertia normal form is (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex), and negating the field multiplies the index by (Negation scales the local index by ); the index of the negated function swaps, (Index and coindex swap under negation).
Proof
By [F1] the field has a zero at (and only at the critical points), and by [F2] its linearization there is the nondegenerate Hessian with negative and positive entries in its inertia normal form; hence is a nondegenerate zero and .
The determinant formula [F3] gives , and the negation rule gives , the second formula; equivalently, has index by the index swap of [F3].
The Morse critical-point sum is the Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a closed smooth -manifold with , and let be a Morse function (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions) and let be a Riemannian metric on (Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric). Then the sum over the finitely many critical points of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth -manifold , a Morse function and a Riemannian metric on .
The field vanishes exactly at the critical points of , which are finitely many, and at a critical point of index its index is (The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points, A Morse gradient zero contributes to the index, Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
Poincare-Hopf: the index sum of a smooth field with only isolated zeros on a closed manifold equals (Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds, Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
Proof
The critical points of a Morse function on a closed manifold are finitely many and each is a nondegenerate zero of ; hence the field has only isolated zeros and [F2] gives .
By [F1] each summand is , so substituting into step 1.1 gives .
Closed odd-dimensional manifolds have zero Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a closed smooth -manifold with odd. Then (Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth -manifold with odd.
There is an excellent Morse function on , and for any Riemannian metric the field vanishes exactly at the (finitely many, nondegenerate) critical points of (Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points, Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
The field has the same zeros as , and ; for odd this is (Negation scales the local index by , Isolated zero and local index of a vector field).
Poincare-Hopf: for a smooth field with only isolated zeros on a closed manifold, the index sum equals (Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds).
Proof
Choose an excellent Morse function and a Riemannian metric ; the field has only isolated (indeed nondegenerate) zeros, so [F3] gives .
The field has the same zero set, and since is odd [F2] gives ; applying [F3] to gives by step 1.1. Hence in , so .
A degree-zero sphere map extends over the ball without zeros
Statement
Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be a continuous map of degree (Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds). Then is homotopic to a constant map, and there is a continuous nowhere-zero map with and (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ). If is smooth, can be chosen smooth with for every with ; in particular restricts to on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a continuous map of degree , and for the smooth clause.
Countable choice is The Axiom of Countable Choice (); it is used only in [F3].
For and a continuous self-map of , the sphere degree of Degree of a self map of an oriented sphere reads the multiplier on the integral top generator of given by Homology of spheres, while the degree of Degree of a map between oriented closed manifolds reads the multiplier of the fundamental classes of the two standard orientations; for these are the same integer. Homotopic maps have equal degree and ; every homotopy equivalence has degree or ; the identity has degree and constant maps have degree (Degree is homotopy invariant and multiplicative under composition, Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps, Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology).
For every the degree is an isomorphism ; hence two based self-maps of are homotopic through based maps if and only if their degrees agree, and the constant map represents the zero element (Based sphere maps are classified by degree).
If two smooth maps between smooth manifolds are continuously homotopic, then they are smoothly homotopic (Continuously homotopic smooth maps are smoothly homotopic).
The standard smooth step function is smooth with for and for (The standard smooth step function).
is the unit sphere in and is contained in (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of ).
Proof
Fix . If put ; otherwise put with . A direct computation gives , and , hence ; thus restricts to a self-map of and is its own continuous inverse, so is a based self-map of at with .
By [F2] the degree is an isomorphism , so , having degree , is based-homotopic to the constant map at ; applying the continuous map to that based homotopy exhibits a homotopy from to the constant map at , proving that is homotopic to a constant.
Let be a homotopy with and , and define and for . Then is continuous away from as a composite of continuous maps, and for continuity at every point of and a finite subcover of the compact sphere give uniformly in as , so ; on we have and ; and takes values in , so is nowhere zero.
Suppose now that is smooth. By [F3] the continuously homotopic smooth maps and the constant are smoothly homotopic; let be a smooth homotopy from to and put , so that is smooth with for and for by [F4]. Then is a smooth homotopy from to with for , and we redefine , for . This is smooth on and equals for (where ), so it is smooth at as well; on the collar it equals , a smooth function of on that collar because , and at the boundary points it equals , where ; so is smooth on with for , and it takes values in , hence is nowhere zero.
Two points avoiding a finite set lie in a common embedded ball
Statement
Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a connected boundaryless smooth -manifold, , let and let be finite. Then there are a smooth embedded closed arc from to and a smoothly embedded closed ball with and (Embedded smooth submanifolds with boundary).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A connected boundaryless smooth -manifold , , distinct , a finite set disjoint from them, and .
Manifolds are locally path-connected; connected locally path-connected spaces are path-connected (Topological manifolds are locally compact and locally path connected, A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open).
Under , the open manifold admits a proper smooth embedding in Euclidean space (The weak Whitney proper embedding theorem). A closed embedded submanifold of complete Euclidean space is complete in its induced Riemannian metric (Closed embedded submanifolds of complete Riemannian manifolds are complete).
Under , every connected complete boundaryless Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete and any two points are joined by a minimizing geodesic (Hopf–Rinow theorem).
Levi–Civita parallel transport is a linear isomorphism preserving inner products, and parallel sections along a smooth curve are smooth (Parallel transport is a linear isomorphism, Levi civita parallel transport preserves lengths angles and volume).
A closed boundaryless embedded submanifold in a smooth ambient manifold has a tubular neighbourhood under (The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold).
Proof
Put . A punctured coordinate ball in dimension is path-connected: join two nonzero points by a broken line through a third point avoiding the two lines through the puncture. To see that is connected, suppose were a separation. For each choose a coordinate ball meeting only at ; its connected punctured ball lies entirely in or entirely in . Add to that side. The resulting two sets are disjoint nonempty open sets covering , a contradiction. Hence is connected and path-connected by [F1].
Embed properly in by [F2]. Its image is closed: a convergent sequence of image points lies in a compact Euclidean ball; properness gives a compact preimage, and a convergent subsequence shows the limit is in the image. The induced metric is complete by [F2]. By [F3] a nonconstant minimizing geodesic joins to . It has constant positive speed and is injective, since deleting any nonconstant loop would shorten it. A continuous injection from the compact interval into a Hausdorff manifold is an embedding, so this is a smooth embedded arc.
Geodesic completeness extends beyond both endpoints. Choose small enough that its restriction to remains an embedding: the positive tangent makes it locally injective at each endpoint, and compactness separates these small endpoint continuations from the portions of the original arc outside their coordinate neighbourhoods and from each other. Let and . Then is boundaryless and closed in , since its closure in is the extended compact arc and only the two removed endpoints are missing. Apply [F5] to . Parallel-transport an orthonormal normal basis along the geodesic by [F4]; its tangent is parallel, so the transported vectors stay normal and give a smooth frame of the normal quotient bundle. The tube is therefore parametrized near its zero section by .
Choose with . Compactness of in the zero section supplies such that the ellipsoid is contained in the tube domain: cover that compact segment by finitely many product neighbourhoods in the open domain and take a common positive fibre radius. The ellipsoid is affinely diffeomorphic to , and its tube image is a smooth embedded closed ball . The points and satisfy the strict ellipsoid inequality because , so . The original arc lies in this ball and avoids , completing both assertions.
Opposite-index nondegenerate zeros cancel in a ball
Statement
Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a smooth -manifold, , let be a smooth vector field and let be a smoothly embedded closed ball whose interior contains exactly two zeros of , both nondegenerate and of opposite index, with on (Embedded smooth submanifolds with boundary). Then there is a smooth vector field on with outside (in particular on a neighbourhood of ) and on ; thus has exactly the zeros of outside and none in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth field on the smooth -manifold , , and a closed ball containing exactly the two nondegenerate zeros in its interior, with opposite indices and on .
Choose a smooth parametrization and pull back the field as . This is a smooth vector field on the closed Euclidean ball, with exactly the two corresponding nondegenerate zeros and no boundary zero. The differential of provides matching base and fibre orientations. The boundary-degree lemma identifies its normalized boundary degree with the sum of local indices, which are preserved under this pullback (The local index is additive under a transverse perturbation, The index sum of an outward field is the Gauss degree, The induced tangent bundle chart).
A smooth map of degree is homotopic to a constant map and admits a smooth nowhere-zero extension with for ; in particular on the boundary sphere (A degree-zero sphere map extends over the ball without zeros).
Each of the two zeros is nondegenerate with index , and the two indices are opposite, so their sum is (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
There are smooth bump functions equal to on a prescribed closed collar of the boundary sphere and supported in a slightly larger collar, and smooth radial interpolations with prescribed values near the two ends of an interval exist (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs).
Proof
In the parametrization of [F1] the normalized field on the boundary sphere is smooth and its degree equals by [F1] and [F3].
Fix so that on the collar , put , and note that the ball of radius contains the same two zeros, so [F1] gives as well; by [F2] applied to there is a smooth nowhere-zero on with for . Put on , choose by [F4] a smooth function with for near and for near , and define on and for : the two formulas agree on the sphere , where both equal and are independent of in a one-sided neighbourhood of it, so is smooth and nowhere zero on , and on a collar because there.
Choose by [F4] a smooth bump equal to on a neighbourhood of the collar and supported in a slightly larger zero-free collar, extend smoothly by zero from that zero-free collar, and write with a positive constant , and put ; then is smooth and positive on the ball with on , so is a smooth nowhere-zero field on the ball, and on that collar . Therefore the field equal to on (transported back by ) and to outside is smooth, agrees with on a neighbourhood of and outside , and is nowhere zero on .
The resulting smooth field on therefore has no zero in and coincides with off , so its zero set is exactly the zero set of outside , as claimed.
The reflection of an outward field extends over the double
Statement
Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a compact smooth -manifold with boundary, , and let be a smooth vector field that is nonzero and points strictly outward along (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors). Choose the collar generated by the inward field . Let be the smooth double defined by this collar, with seam involution interchanging the two labelled halves (The double of a smooth manifold with boundary, The double has a well-defined smooth structure). Then defines a smooth vector field on this double (an arbitrary fixed collar need not give a smooth field); its zeros are exactly the two copies of the zeros of , and for every isolated zero
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact smooth -manifold with boundary, a smooth field nonzero and strictly outward along , and the labelled double .
is the quotient of identifying the two copies of , with the involution interchanging the labelled halves; smooth collar data near the seam give it the structure of a smooth boundaryless manifold, and two collar choices give structures related by a diffeomorphism fixing the seam pointwise and preserving the halves (The double of a smooth manifold with boundary, The double has a well-defined smooth structure).
Because is strictly outward and nonzero on the compact boundary, there is such that has no zero in the -neighbourhood of ; the zeros of therefore lie in the interior at positive distance from (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors).
The inward field has smooth local forward semiflows at boundary points, using smooth coordinate extensions across the face (Inward-pointing fields have local forward semiflows at the boundary). Their differentials at time zero are invertible because is transverse to the boundary. Compactness supplies a uniform short time. Uniqueness and strict inwardness make the map injective: a trajectory cannot return to the boundary, since its boundary defining coordinate has positive derivative at any putative return. Thus is a global collar for short time, and in its coordinates.
The index is independent of the chart and of a trivialization with matching base and fibre orientations, and negation scales it by (The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization, Negation scales the local index by ).
Proof
If , the double is the disjoint union of two copies, and the two fields are and . Otherwise use the single global flow collar of [F4] to define the double's smooth structure. Its seam charts have signed coordinate , with . This is the collar-defined double of [F1], rather than a replacement of an already fixed smooth structure while keeping unchanged.
In these charts on the first half. Reflection followed by negation gives on the second half. The prescriptions therefore agree at the seam and give one smooth nonzero expression there. Off the seam they are and the push-forward of , so they are smooth globally.
There are no seam zeros, and off the seam the zero set consists precisely of the two copies of . For any isolated zero , a chart at transported by identifies the second field with . Chart invariance and [F5] give . The same computation applies to the two disjoint copies when the boundary is empty.
The index sum of an outward field on an even-dimensional manifold
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact smooth -manifold with nonempty boundary, even, and let be a smooth vector field with only isolated zeros that is nonzero and strictly outward along (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors). Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact smooth even-dimensional manifold with nonempty boundary, and a smooth field on with only isolated zeros, nonzero and strictly outward along .
Reduction: the zeros of lie in the interior at positive distance from , because on the compact boundary and there are finitely many zeros; hence, by part (iii) of the index-perturbation lemma, they can be perturbed inside disjoint small balls contained in the interior of and away from a neighbourhood of , producing a field with only nondegenerate zeros, the same index sum, and still strictly outward on (The local index is additive under a transverse perturbation, Isolated zero and local index of a vector field, Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors).
Doubling: choose the global flow collar of and use it to define , a closed smooth -manifold with seam involution , and the reflected field of The reflection of an outward field extends over the double is smooth, has zeros exactly the two copies of the zeros of , and for every zero , (The double of a smooth manifold with boundary, The double has a well-defined smooth structure, Negation scales the local index by ).
Poincare-Hopf on : the index sum of on the closed manifold equals (Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds).
Additivity: by part (iii) of Finiteness and additivity of the Euler characteristic; the inclusion is a cofibration, because the collar of Collar neighborhood theorem is a neighbourhood deformation retract structure, whose mapping-cylinder retraction characterizes cofibrations (Cofibrations are characterized by a retraction of the mapping cylinder strip); and because is a closed manifold of odd dimension (Closed odd-dimensional manifolds have zero Euler characteristic, Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
Proof
Apply the reduction of [F1] and replace by a field with only nondegenerate zeros, the same index sum, and still strictly outward on ; it suffices to prove the identity for , and by The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero each of its zeros has index .
Form the field-adapted double and the reflected field ; by [F2] the zeros of are the two copies of the zeros of and, since is even, , so the index sum over is twice the index sum over ; Poincare-Hopf [F3] gives .
By [F4], ; substituting into step 2.1 gives , hence in , and by step 1.1 the same identity holds for the original field .
Poincare-Hopf with outward-pointing boundary
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact smooth -manifold, , and let be a smooth vector field with only isolated zeros that is nonzero and strictly outward along (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors; the boundary clause is vacuous when ). Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact smooth -manifold , , and a smooth field with only isolated zeros, strictly outward along .
If , the statement is Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds; if is even and , it is The index sum of an outward field on an even-dimensional manifold.
Products of a boundary chart of with an endpoint half-interval give normal quadrant charts; on boundaryless interiors the ordinary product theorem applies. For odd , the product , with its two codimension-two corner strata and rounded by the standard corner-rounding convention, is a compact smooth -manifold with boundary (an even-dimensional one); its boundary is the rounded version of , and the rounding changes only a collar of the corner strata, so is homotopy equivalent to (the rounded product is a deformation retract of the original product: in each inward normal quadrant, slide along to the first point of the retained rounded region. The required nonnegative displacement is continuous because the rounding profile is monotone and transverse to , and is zero on the retained region. Multiplying that displacement by a homotopy parameter gives a deformation fixing the rounded region, supported in the corner collar. The normal formulas agree along the corner stratum. Thus the rounded product is homotopy equivalent to , so homology is unchanged and ) (Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure, Attaching a smooth handle with corner rounding, Smooth handle attachment is independent of corner rounding up to diffeomorphism, Homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on singular homology, Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
A product-type zero is nondegenerate with the product index: if has a nondegenerate zero at and has its simple zero at , then has a nondegenerate zero at with ; the linearization is block diagonal with blocks and (The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero, Nondegenerate zero of a vector field).
The field is strictly outward along : on the outward normal of is the outward normal of in and the inward boundary defining coordinate satisfies ; on the outward normal is and ; on the outward normal is and (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors). Near a lower corner use inward coordinates , ; near an upper corner use , . In a sufficiently small uniform corner neighbourhood, both and . Choose the standard monotone rounding whose outward conormal is , where and . Its evaluation on is strictly positive, so stays strictly outward on every rounded face as well. The rounding is supported away from all zeros and from .
Reduction to nondegenerate zeros of by The local index is additive under a transverse perturbation can be performed inside the interior of , leaving a neighbourhood of fixed, hence preserving strict outwardness.
Proof
If or is even the statement is [F1]; assume therefore that is odd and . Apply [F5] to replace by a field with only nondegenerate zeros, the same index sum and still strictly outward, and put and .
The zeros of are exactly the points with , all interior, and by [F3] each is nondegenerate with ; the field is strictly outward along by [F4]. Since is even, the even-dimensional boundary lemma [F1] applies to and gives by [F2].
By step 1.1 the index sum of equals that of , so ; the remaining cases were handled in step 1.1, completing the proof.
The Euler number of the tangent bundle is the Euler characteristic
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).
(i) Let be a closed oriented smooth -manifold, . Then the Euler number of the tangent bundle satisfies where is the Euler class of Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class and the bracket is the Kronecker evaluation; equivalently the diagonal satisfies in the self-intersection number of The self-intersection number of a complementary-dimensional oriented submanifold.
(ii) For any closed smooth -manifold with , with the top Stiefel-Whitney class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed smooth -manifold , oriented in part (i).
Choose an excellent Morse function and a Riemannian metric . The section of vanishes exactly at and is transverse to the zero section there (the linearization is the nondegenerate Hessian) (The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points, Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, Morse functions and excellent Morse functions).
The signed zero count of a transverse section of a rank- oriented bundle over a closed oriented -manifold equals ; the local sign of a zero of a vector field, read on the zero-section/graph intersection in with the horizontal-then-vertical orientation, is the index of the zero (The self-intersection number is the Euler number of the normal bundle, The index of a zero is its zero-section intersection number, Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class).
The signed zero count of is , and this equals ; in particular the Euler number is . The diagonal form is the self-intersection statement for , and over the unsigned zero count satisfies , since the canonical mod 2 Euler class is the top Stiefel-Whitney class (A Morse gradient zero contributes to the index, Morse Euler characteristic identity, The diagonal self-intersection is the Euler number of the tangent bundle, The mod two self-intersection is the top Stiefel-Whitney evaluation, The mod-two Euler class is the top Stiefel–Whitney class).
Under the assumed AC, is paracompact Hausdorff and CGWH with CW homotopy type, and the smooth tangent bundle is numerable (Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type). These are the base and bundle hypotheses of the cited Thom and Stiefel-Whitney results.
Proof
For (i): by [F1] the section is transverse to the zero section with zero set , and by [F2] its signed zero count equals ; by [F3] that signed count is , so .
The diagonal statement of [F3] identifies with , so it equals as well.
For (ii): the unsigned count of the transverse section satisfies by [F3], while because ; hence .
Converse Poincare-Hopf for nowhere-zero fields
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a closed connected smooth -manifold, . Then admits a nowhere-zero smooth vector field (A smooth vector field is a smooth section of the tangent bundle) if and only if (Euler characteristic of a compact manifold).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed connected smooth -manifold , .
If admits a nowhere-zero field then (A nowhere-zero vector field forces zero Euler characteristic).
For : if then is diffeomorphic to the circle , which carries the standard nowhere-zero rotational field ; the empty manifold admits the empty field vacuously (Nonempty closed connected 1-manifolds are circles).
For : choose an excellent Morse function and a Riemannian metric ; the field has only nondegenerate zeros, namely the critical points, and a critical point of index has index (Every compact smooth manifold admits an excellent Morse function, Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential, The Riemannian gradient vanishes exactly at the critical points, A Morse gradient zero contributes to the index, The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero).
Poincare-Hopf: (Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds).
Given two remaining zeros of opposite index, the ball-selection lemma gives a smooth closed ball containing them in its interior and avoiding every other remaining zero (Two points avoiding a finite set lie in a common embedded ball). They can be cancelled by a modification supported in the interior of that ball, agreeing with the current field near its boundary (Opposite-index nondegenerate zeros cancel in a ball). Subsequent balls may overlap previous ones; they need only avoid the other zeros of the current field.
Proof
The forward implication is [F1]. For the converse, the empty manifold has the empty nowhere-zero field. A nonempty closed connected -manifold is a circle by [F2]; transporting its rotational field gives a nowhere-zero field.
Let and . Choose the Morse gradient of [F3]. Its finite zero set has indices , and their sum is zero by [F4], so the numbers of positive and negative zeros agree. If there are no zeros, the claim follows immediately.
Otherwise select one zero of each sign and use [F5] with the finite set of all other current zeros. The resulting ball contains exactly that pair and no boundary zero. Cancel the pair inside it, leaving the field unchanged near the boundary and outside the ball. No new zeros are introduced, and every other zero and its local germ are unchanged. Thus the new field again has equally many positive and negative nondegenerate zeros, with two fewer zeros. Repeating this finite process ends with a smooth nowhere-zero field. This uses neither disjoint supports nor a claim that deleting balls preserves connectedness.
Nonempty closed connected 1-manifolds are circles
Statement
Assume . Every nonempty closed connected smooth -manifold is diffeomorphic to the circle with its standard smooth structure (The circle as with basepoint , Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds). Here closed means compact with empty boundary; the empty manifold is excluded because it is connected under Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets but is not diffeomorphic to a circle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty closed connected smooth -manifold , and .
: every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Every compact smooth -manifold , possibly with boundary, is diffeomorphic to a finite disjoint union of copies of the circle and of the closed interval ; a diffeomorphism of manifolds with boundary maps onto the boundary of the target, and each closed-interval component contributes exactly its two endpoints to that boundary (Boundary of a compact 1-manifold has even cardinality).
A closed smooth manifold is by definition a compact smooth manifold with empty boundary (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right); in particular .
The circle is with the quotient topology and its standard smooth structure, and a diffeomorphism is a bijective smooth map whose inverse is smooth (The circle as with basepoint , Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds).
Proof
By [F2] the manifold is compact with , so [F1] provides a diffeomorphism from onto a finite disjoint union ; a diffeomorphism of manifolds with boundary carries boundary to boundary, and the boundary of the target is the union of the two endpoints of each interval component, so corresponds to and forces .
Consequently is diffeomorphic to , a disjoint union of copies of the circle. Each circle is a nonempty connected component of that disjoint union, so the union is connected only when , and is nonempty, so ; hence is diffeomorphic to the standard circle , the model of [F3], as claimed.
The outward boundary hypothesis cannot be replaced by nonzero on the boundary
Remarks
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) for the applications of the general index theorems below.
The hypothesis in Poincare-Hopf with outward-pointing boundary is strictly stronger than " on ": a field that is nonzero on the boundary but not outward, with only isolated zeros, contributes a boundary correction term. On the closed unit ball , odd, the inward radial field is nonzero on and has the single zero , which is nondegenerate with linearization (Inward, outward, and boundary-tangent vectors, Isolated zero and local index of a vector field); by The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero its index is . On the other hand , because is contractible with the rational homology of a point (Contractible nonempty spaces have the homology of a point, The Axiom of Choice, Euler characteristic of a compact manifold). Hence : nonzero on the boundary does not suffice, and the outwardness in the boundary form is a genuine hypothesis rather than a convenience.
In even dimensions the inward radial field on has index and happens to agree with , despite not being outward. Thus equality of the index sum with does not imply outwardness. For a compact smooth full-dimensional Euclidean domain , , the boundary lemma identifies the index sum of a smooth field with only isolated zeros and nonzero on with the degree of its normalized boundary map (reduced degree when ). Outwardness is sufficient to identify that degree with the Gauss degree, which equals by the outward-boundary theorem. This sphere-map description uses the Euclidean tangent trivialization and is not asserted for an arbitrary manifold with a possibly nontrivial tangent bundle.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- John W. Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (complete 76-page PDF, including the appendix Classifying 1-manifolds)
- Victor Guillemin and Alan Pollack, Differential Topology (Prentice-Hall 1974; complete PDF)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 2.2
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §2.1 and §3.1
- Joel W. Robbin and Dietmar A. Salamon, Introduction to Differential Topology (web draft 2018, complete PDF)
- John W. Milnor and James D. Stasheff, Characteristic Classes (Princeton University Press, 1974; complete PDF)
- Liviu Nicolaescu, An Invitation to Morse Theory (2nd ed.)
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed.
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy (author draft)
- John Milnor, Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (complete 76-page PDF, including the appendix Classifying 1-manifolds)