Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-10 (gpt-6-astra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem

Statement

Assume countable choice ACω. Let S⊆Rm be an embedded smooth submanifold. Then there is a positive smooth function δ:S→(0,∞) such that the restricted normal addition map E:Ωδ→Rm,Ωδ:={(p,v)∈N⊥S:∥v∥<δ(p)}, is a diffeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of S. In particular, S has a tubular neighbourhood in Rm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and an embedded smooth submanifold S⊆Rm.

[L1]

The model map in this statement is the normal addition map (The normal addition map for a Euclidean submanifold).

[L2]

Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section (Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section).

[L3]

Under countable choice, the construction in Variable-radius injectivity for normal addition produces a positive smooth injectivity radius. More precisely, for its capped local-diffeomorphism supremum r(p), proof steps 4.1–6.1 construct a smooth δ with 0<δ(p)≤r(p)/4. We use this particular constructed radius, not an arbitrary radius on which the map happens to be injective.

[A1]

Countable choice is The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). It covers the normal-bundle manifold interface underlying [L1, L2] and the proper-exhaustion construction used to obtain the smooth radius in [L3].

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1given

If S=∅, take the unique function δ:S→(0,∞). Then Ωδ=∅, and E is a diffeomorphism from the empty manifold onto the open neighbourhood ∅ of S. Hence assume S≠∅.

2.1L1L2step 1.1construct

For p∈S and a>0 set Va(p)={(q,v)∈N⊥S:∥q−p∥<a, ∥v∥<a},Ap={a∈(0,1]:E∣Va(p) is a diffeomorphism onto its image}. The normal bundle has its induced topology in Rm×Rm, so these open sets form a neighbourhood basis at (p,0). Thus [L2] makes Ap nonempty, and it is bounded above by one. Put r(p)=sup⁡Ap∈(0,1]. For every 0<a<r(p) some b∈Ap satisfies a<b, and restricting its diffeomorphism to Va(p) proves a∈Ap. This is the same capped function as in [L3].

3.1A1L3step 2.1choose

Take the positive smooth δ specifically constructed in [L3]. Its stated proof bound gives δ(p)≤r(p)/4 and its injectivity conclusion gives injectivity of E on Ωδ. The construction uses compact sublevel minima of r and explicit locally finite one-variable bumps composed with a smooth proper exhaustion; no manifold partition or additional radius selection is invoked here.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Local invertibility on the entire tube needs a separate argument. If (p,v)∈Ωδ, then ∥v∥<δ(p)≤r(p)/4<r(p). Choose a real a strictly between ∥v∥ and r(p), for example their arithmetic mean. By step 2.1, E∣Va(p) is a diffeomorphism, and (p,v)∈Va(p). Hence E is a local diffeomorphism at every point of Ωδ. This follows from the quantitative radius bound and the eligible neighbourhoods, not from injectivity alone.

5.1L1step 3.1step 4.1

The set Ωδ is open in the normal bundle: its defining inequality is the strict negativity of the continuous function (p,v)↦∥v∥−δ(p). Here the vector coordinate, bundle projection and positive smooth δ are continuous. Thus the neighbourhoods from step 4.1 can be intersected with Ωδ to give local diffeomorphisms for the restricted map, which is injective by step 3.1.

6.1L1step 1.1step 5.1∎

A local diffeomorphism is open. Hence U:=E(Ωδ) is open and contains S because E(p,0)=p. The injective local diffeomorphism E:Ωδ→U is a homeomorphism, and its local smooth inverses agree and assemble to a smooth global inverse. Thus E is the required diffeomorphism. Together with the empty case in step 1.1, this proves the theorem.

Remarks

The radius is smooth, not merely continuous. No completeness, compactness, or positive-dimensional hypothesis on S is imposed. Once the normal-bundle manifold data and the particular smooth radius constructed in the cited lemma are supplied, the remaining tube and inverse construction requires no further choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources