How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem
Statement
Let be an embedded smooth submanifold. Then there is a positive smooth function such that the restricted normal addition map is a diffeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of . In particular, has a tubular neighbourhood in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An embedded smooth submanifold .
The model map in this statement is the normal addition map (The normal addition map for a Euclidean submanifold).
Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section and is injective on a sufficiently small smooth variable-radius neighbourhood (Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section, Variable-radius injectivity for normal addition).
Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).
Proof
If , take the unique function . Then , and is a diffeomorphism from the empty manifold onto the open neighbourhood of . Hence assume .
Let be the union of all normal-bundle neighbourhoods on which [L2] makes a local diffeomorphism. It is open and contains the zero section. By shrinking bundle trivializations around their base points, choose an open cover of and numbers such that By [L3], choose a locally finite smooth partition subordinate to this cover.
Define The locally finite sum is smooth and positive. At each , the finite nonempty set has an index with . Since and , the whole fibre ball over lies in .
Let be the positive smooth injectivity radius supplied by [L2], and put This function is positive and smooth, with and .
The set is open in because is continuous. Since , step 3.1 gives , so is a local diffeomorphism at every point of . Since , [L2] also makes injective on .
A local diffeomorphism is open. Hence is open and contains because . The injective local diffeomorphism is a homeomorphism, and its local smooth inverses agree and assemble to a smooth global inverse. Thus is the required diffeomorphism. Together with the empty case in step 1.1, this proves the theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- A closed Euclidean submanifold has a smooth neighborhood retraction Corollary
- A noncompact embedded curve with no uniform tubular radius Example
- The sphere and its two-sided normal tube Example
- The standard circle and its annular tubular neighbourhood Example
- FALSE: every noncompact submanifold has a uniform-radius tubular neighbourhood False statement
- A fine Euclidean approximation lands in a prescribed tubular neighbourhood Lemma
- Nearest-point projection is the tubular retraction after shrinking Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, Part 11, Theorem 3.54 (standard reference, not scraped)