How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem
Statement
Assume countable choice . Let be an embedded smooth submanifold. Then there is a positive smooth function such that the restricted normal addition map is a diffeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of . In particular, has a tubular neighbourhood in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and an embedded smooth submanifold .
The model map in this statement is the normal addition map (The normal addition map for a Euclidean submanifold).
Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section (Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section).
Under countable choice, the construction in Variable-radius injectivity for normal addition produces a positive smooth injectivity radius. More precisely, for its capped local-diffeomorphism supremum , proof steps 4.1–6.1 construct a smooth with . We use this particular constructed radius, not an arbitrary radius on which the map happens to be injective.
Countable choice is The Axiom of Countable Choice (). It covers the normal-bundle manifold interface underlying [L1, L2] and the proper-exhaustion construction used to obtain the smooth radius in [L3].
Proof
If , take the unique function . Then , and is a diffeomorphism from the empty manifold onto the open neighbourhood of . Hence assume .
For and set The normal bundle has its induced topology in , so these open sets form a neighbourhood basis at . Thus [L2] makes nonempty, and it is bounded above by one. Put . For every some satisfies , and restricting its diffeomorphism to proves . This is the same capped function as in [L3].
Take the positive smooth specifically constructed in [L3]. Its stated proof bound gives and its injectivity conclusion gives injectivity of on . The construction uses compact sublevel minima of and explicit locally finite one-variable bumps composed with a smooth proper exhaustion; no manifold partition or additional radius selection is invoked here.
Local invertibility on the entire tube needs a separate argument. If , then . Choose a real strictly between and , for example their arithmetic mean. By step 2.1, is a diffeomorphism, and . Hence is a local diffeomorphism at every point of . This follows from the quantitative radius bound and the eligible neighbourhoods, not from injectivity alone.
The set is open in the normal bundle: its defining inequality is the strict negativity of the continuous function . Here the vector coordinate, bundle projection and positive smooth are continuous. Thus the neighbourhoods from step 4.1 can be intersected with to give local diffeomorphisms for the restricted map, which is injective by step 3.1.
A local diffeomorphism is open. Hence is open and contains because . The injective local diffeomorphism is a homeomorphism, and its local smooth inverses agree and assemble to a smooth global inverse. Thus is the required diffeomorphism. Together with the empty case in step 1.1, this proves the theorem.
Remarks
The radius is smooth, not merely continuous. No completeness, compactness, or positive-dimensional hypothesis on is imposed. Once the normal-bundle manifold data and the particular smooth radius constructed in the cited lemma are supplied, the remaining tube and inverse construction requires no further choice.
Depends on
Used by
- A closed Euclidean submanifold has a smooth neighborhood retraction Corollary
- Collapse of a framed neat cobordism in X times I Definition
- The standard circle and its annular tubular neighbourhood Example
- FALSE: every noncompact submanifold has a uniform-radius tubular neighbourhood False statement
- A clean framed Whitney bigon has an adapted tube Lemma
- A collared Whitney disk can avoid an entire compact immersed image Lemma
- A height-zero diagram represents a closed braid Lemma
- A smooth isotopy of a compact manifold extends to an ambient isotopy Lemma
- A tubular target produces a submersive finite-dimensional perturbation family Lemma
- Embedded bands joining two framed spheres exist Lemma
- Every bordism class is realized by an embedded collapse Lemma
- Finite C2 surface carriers have smooth normal forms and relative cap approximations Lemma
- Immersion extension on a disk: absolute and relative parametric forms Lemma
- Metastable approximation of maps by embeddings Lemma
- p-surgery kills the represented pi-p class below the middle dimension Lemma
- Positive-codimension thickening reduces closed sources to the open case Lemma
- Relative tubular neighborhoods preserve a chain of submersions Lemma
- Restriction of formal-immersion data has the parametric lifting property Lemma
- Smooth manifolds have CW homotopy type Lemma
- Smoothing continuous families of formal immersions Lemma
- Smoothing continuous families of genuine immersions Lemma
- Two disjoint circles in the two-sphere cobound an annulus Lemma
- Whitney normal tubes have submersive radius and bounded stratumwise lifts Lemma
- Whitney stratifications admit compatible control data Lemma
- Nearest-point projection is the tubular retraction after shrinking Proposition
- The Lefschetz index formula recovers Poincare-Hopf Remark
- Algebraic Whitney strata have controlled local conical neighborhoods Theorem
- Poincare-Hopf for closed manifolds Theorem
- Smale–Hirsch for open source manifolds Theorem
- Strong Whitney approximation by transverse maps Theorem
- The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold Theorem
- The universal Pontryagin-Thom correspondence for unoriented and oriented bordism Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, Topology I: Smooth Manifolds, Part 11, Theorem 3.54 (standard reference, not scraped)