Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A smooth isotopy of a compact manifold extends to an ambient isotopy

Statement

Assume ACω. Let M be a compact smooth manifold without boundary, let N be a smooth manifold, and let F ⁣:M×I→N be a smooth isotopy such that Ft:=F(⋅,t) is an embedding for every t∈I. Suppose F is constant near the ends of I: there is ε∈(0,12) with F(x,t)=F(x,0) for t≤ε and F(x,t)=F(x,1) for t≥1−ε and all x∈M. Then for every open neighbourhood W of the image F(M×I) there is an ambient isotopy H ⁣:N×I→N such that

Ht∘F0=Ftfor every t∈I,

H0=idN, each Ht is a diffeomorphism of N, and Ht is the identity outside W for every t. Moreover Ht=idN for t∈[0,ε2] and Ht=H1 for t∈[1−ε2,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a compact boundaryless smooth manifold M, a smooth manifold N, a smooth isotopy F ⁣:M×I→N with every Ft an embedding and F constant on M×[0,ε]∪M×[1−ε,1] for some ε∈(0,12), and an open neighbourhood W of F(M×I) in N.

[F1]

ACω is the countable axiom of choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

Assume ACω: every open cover of a smooth manifold with boundary admits a smooth partition of unity subordinate to it, and a smooth partition of unity subordinate to a cover (Uj)j∈J is a family (ϕj)j∈J of smooth functions M→[0,1] with locally finite supports, supp⁡ϕj⊆Uj and ∑jϕj=1 (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds with boundary, Smooth partition of unity on a manifold with boundary).

[F4]

Assume ACω. For a smooth embedded submanifold S↪N and a smooth vector field Y along S: if S is closed in N, then there is a global smooth vector field Y^ on N with Y^∣S=Y (A vector field along an embedded submanifold extends to a neighbourhood and globally when the submanifold is closed).

[F5]

Let J⊆R be a compact interval and let Xt be a smooth time-dependent vector field on N whose union of supports over t∈J is contained in a compact subset K⊆N. Then there is a global evolution operator Ψt,s ⁣:N→N for all s,t∈J (Compactly supported time-dependent vector fields have global evolution on a compact time interval): Ψs,s=idN, the cocycle law Ψu,t∘Ψt,s=Ψu,s holds, each Ψt,s is smooth, and for fixed s and p the curve t↦Ψt,s(p) solves γ˙(t)=Xt(γ(t)).

[F6]

A smooth map F ⁣:M→N is a smooth embedding when it is injective, an immersion, and a homeomorphism onto its image with the subspace topology (Smooth embeddings).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenconstruct

Compactness of the image and a relatively compact neighbourhood. If M=∅, take Ht=idN for every t; all extension and support assertions are then immediate. Assume M≠∅. The set K:=F(M×I)⊆N is compact, being the continuous image of the compact space M×I, and it is closed in N because smooth manifolds are Hausdorff. Each point of K has a coordinate ball whose closure is compact and contained in W; finitely many of these balls cover K, and their union V is an open neighbourhood of K with compact closure V‾⊆W. Fix such a V.

1.2F6givenalgebra

The velocity field along the slices, as a field along a graph. Extend F to R×M by Ft=F0 for t<0 and Ft=F1 for t>1. This extension is smooth because the given F is constant on the full endpoint collars of width ε, and every extended slice remains an embedding. Put J:=R and consider the map Θ ⁣:J×M→J×N, Θ(t,x):=(t,Ft(x)), with image S:=Θ(J×M). Θ is injective because its first coordinate is t; its derivative at (t,x) equals (dt,∂tF(x,t) dt+d(Ft)x), which is injective because d(Ft)x is injective by [F6]; and Θ is proper: for a compact subset L⊆J×N, its time projection is compact, and Θ−1(L) is closed in the compact product of that projection with M. The inverse on the image is continuous locally by the embedding property of its slices, or globally by this properness. Its injective derivative therefore makes S a closed embedded submanifold without boundary of J×N, of dimension 1+dim⁡M. The constant time extension avoids applying a boundaryless extension theorem to a graph with boundary. The assignment Y(t,Ft(x)):=(0,∂tF(x,t))∈T(t,Ft(x))(J×N) is well defined because each Ft is injective, and it is a smooth vector field along S: near a point of S the inverse y↦x of Ft is smooth by [F6], so Y is the composite of smooth maps; along S it is everywhere tangent to the splitting of T(J×N) into the J-direction and TN.

2.1F2F4step 1.2construct

Extension and truncation. By [F4] applied to the closed embedded submanifold S of the smooth manifold J×N, the field Y extends to a global smooth vector field Y~ on J×N with Y~∣S=Y. Write Y~=(a,X) in the splitting T(J×N)≅R⊕TN, so that X is a smooth family Xt:=X(t,⋅) of vector fields on N with Xt(Ft(x))=∂tF(x,t) for all x∈M and t∈J. Choose a smooth function ψ ⁣:N→[0,1] with ψ=1 on a neighbourhood of K and supp⁡ψ⊆V: the open sets V and N∖K cover N because K is closed, so [F2] applied to this two-element cover produces ψ as the member subordinate to V, whose support lies in V. The other member has closed support contained in N∖K; its support complement is an open neighbourhood of K on which that other member vanishes and hence ψ=1. Choose a smooth β ⁣:R→[0,1] with β=1 on [ε,1−ε] and β=0 on (−∞,ε2]∪[1−ε2,∞), and put Xt′:=β(t) ψ Xt for t∈J. Every Xt′ is a smooth vector field on N with supp⁡Xt′⊆V‾, so ⋃t∈Isupp⁡Xt′⊆V‾ is compact.

3.1F5step 2.1

The ambient isotopy. Apply [F5] on the compact interval I to the family Xt′ of step 2.1 and let Ψt,s be the resulting global evolution operator. Put Ht:=Ψt,0 for t∈I. Then H0=idN, the map H ⁣:N×I→N is smooth, and each Ht is a diffeomorphism with inverse Ht−1=Ψ0,t, by the cocycle law in [F5]. Since supp⁡Xt′⊆V for every t, every trajectory of X′ starting outside V is constant, so Ht=idN on N∖V for every t; a fortiori Ht is the identity outside W, because V⊆W. Finally Xt′=0 whenever t≤ε2 or t≥1−ε2, because β vanishes there. Uniqueness of the evolution with zero velocity gives Ψt,s=idN when s,t belong to either one of those intervals. Starting at time zero therefore gives Ht=idN on the initial interval. On the terminal interval the cocycle law gives H1=Ψ1,t∘Ht=Ht, so the ambient isotopy is stationary at its final map there.

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1algebra

The isotopy identity. Fix x∈M and consider γ(t):=Ft(x). Then γ(0)=F0(x), and for every t∈I the derivative is γ′(t)=∂tF(x,t). Since γ(t)∈K for all t, we have ψ(γ(t))=1, and therefore Xt′(γ(t))=β(t) ∂tF(x,t). If t∈[ε,1−ε] then β(t)=1 and this equals γ′(t); if t∉[ε,1−ε] then either β(t)=0 or, by the standing hypothesis that F is constant near the ends, ∂tF(x,t)=0; in both cases Xt′(γ(t))=0=γ′(t). Hence γ solves the initial-value problem γ˙=Xt′(γ), γ(0)=F0(x), and by the defining property of the evolution operator in [F5] the unique solution is t↦Ψt,0(F0(x))=Ht(F0(x)).

5.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Conclusion. Step 4.1 gives Ht∘F0=Ft for every t∈I; step 3.1 gives that H0=idN, that every Ht is a diffeomorphism, that Ht=idN outside W, and that Ht=idN for t∈[0,ε2] and Ht=H1 for t∈[1−ε2,1]. Thus H is an ambient isotopy of N extending the isotopy F of F0(M) and supported in the prescribed neighbourhood W.

Remarks

  • The argument is the standard proof of the isotopy extension theorem: the velocity of the isotopy is read as a vector field along the image of the trajectory (t,x)↦(t,Ft(x)), extended to the ambient manifold, truncated to a prescribed neighbourhood, and integrated. The neighbourhood-retraction corollary and the Euclidean tubular-neighbourhood theorem recorded as dependencies of this item are the standard alternative suppliers of the same extension step; the proof above quotes the vector-field extension lemma directly.
  • Compactness of M is used twice: to make F(M×I) compact, so that W may be taken with compact closure and the field truncated, and to make Θ proper, so that S is closed in J×N and the extension lemma [F4] applies in its global form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources