How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-codimension thickening reduces closed sources to the open case
Statement
Assume . Let be closed, boundaryless, and . Fix a rank- smooth bundle , where , and a bundle metric on . Write . Define the enriched spaces The normal identification is part of the datum, not a condition defining a subspace of the ordinary immersion space. Use the weak smooth topology also on these bundle maps. The reduction comprises: (i) every datum in admits a formal extension to ; (ii) restriction to the zero section, with the induced quotient identification from the vertical derivative, gives weak homotopy equivalences and ; (iii) the equidimensional open-source theorem on , the fixed-dimension collar comparison, and these restriction maps give the enriched derivative equivalence. Descent to ordinary immersion spaces additionally compares the two normal-identification forgetful fibrations, with their common fibre the smooth bundle automorphism space of . Relative families use data holonomic on open neighbourhoods of the prescribed closed parameter set.
Constructive formal extension
The tangent bundle of has vertical subbundle canonically and quotient . A horizontal splitting can be constructed without asserting a canonical one. Cover compact by finitely many bundle charts and choose a smooth partition of unity subordinate to them. In each chart differentiate the fibre coordinates to get a vertical projection which is the identity on vertical vectors. Their weighted sum is again the identity on vertical vectors. Thus maps isomorphically to under , giving . Only finite chart choices are needed; the partition supplier is Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds.
Choose a metric on and lift uniquely to the orthogonal complement of , writing this lift . The complement and quotient identification are supplied by Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity. Define the base map and Both summands have complementary images; is an isomorphism, so is fibrewise injective. On the tangent of the zero section it equals , while on the vertical tangent its quotient is exactly . This proves (i), including the empty-base case. The rank and compactness assertions for are those of Disk bundles over compact bases are compact manifolds with boundary.
There is also a concrete formal fibre deformation. In the preceding local construction is linear in the fibre variable, so fibre multiplication preserves the horizontal distribution. Identify horizontal and vertical tangent summands at and by the identity on , calling this isomorphism . For a formal extension set and . Unlike , this map does not multiply vertical inputs by and remains injective even at . At it is determined by the full zero-section data. With fixed, its vertical map is for a unique ; interpolation preserves complementary images. These formulas contract the formal restriction fibre to the extension just constructed and depend continuously in every compact jet seminorm. This proves the formal restriction comparison; the genuine comparison is constructed below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The closed source, positive-rank metric bundle , enriched spaces, and countable-choice assumption in the Statement. The open-source derivative equivalence used in part (iii) is the prerequisite Smale–Hirsch for open source manifolds.
The fixed splitting of and the orthogonal lift constructed above depend continuously on formal data, and commute with restriction to parameter subsets. The formulas above give a fibre-preserving deformation of formal extensions to the canonical formal section of .
The target embedding, Euclidean tubular retraction, and inverse function theorem provide a smooth local addition for near zero, with and ; the map has a smooth inverse near the diagonal, written (Every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space, The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem, The Euclidean inverse function theorem). Concretely in the target embedding. This is target geometry and does not require the source immersion to be embedded.
The fixed-dimensional collar comparison identifies derivative weak equivalence on with that on (Formal-immersion homotopies extend over a collar). Fibration comparison can use the exact homotopy sequence, including its component action (Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration).
Proof
The formal section and fibre-preserving homotopy in [F1] show that is a homotopy equivalence, not merely a map with contractible fibres. Indeed , and fibre contraction followed by interpolation of the tangential component of the vertical map gives . All maps are jointly continuous in the weak smooth topology because fibre scaling, the fixed horizontal splitting, and smooth orthogonal projection are continuous in every compact jet seminorm.
For enriched genuine data let be the orthogonal lift of relative to . The germ is an immersion near the zero section: its derivative there is , an isomorphism. For a compact family of these data, compactness of the parameter space times gives a single positive radius on which every germ is defined and immersive. Define Its fibre image has radius less than , its derivative at zero is the identity, and its radial and tangential eigenvalues away from zero are respectively and , both positive. Thus for sufficiently small common , is an immersion of the entire fixed with .
Let be a compact continuous family of immersions and write , , and . Since , is an isomorphism. For and near zero put In bundle charts Taylor's integral formula writes the argument at as . This extends continuously in all spatial derivatives to , smoothly when the parameter family is smooth. Every has derivative along the zero section, independent of . Compactness of parameters times and openness of invertibility consequently give a common small radius on which all are defined and immersive.
Let consist of data with normal bundle isomorphic to , and let be the corresponding immersion locus. Fix and an identification . For close to , [F2] identifies with by the invertible vertical derivative of at . Project this identification from onto . At it is the identity, hence it remains invertible on a weak-smooth neighbourhood, by compactness of . Taking quotients gives a continuously varying isomorphism . Therefore is a local product chart for the formal forgetful map. The same chart restricted to gives the genuine forgetful chart. In particular and are open loci, and the derivative map induces the identity on each common gauge fibre.
Precompose with the embeddings of obtained by interpolating fibrewise between and . Both radial derivative and tangential eigenvalue of the interpolation are positive, its norm is at most , and its derivative at zero is the identity. This is a homotopy through immersions from to , with fixed. Next decrease from one to zero in . Finally decompose , where is the orthogonal lift of , and interpolate to by . The maps remain isomorphisms because their quotient on is the fixed isomorphism . Shrinking the same common if necessary makes immersive for all . This gives a compact-family homotopy, entirely over the unchanged enriched data, from to .
The two forgetful maps are Serre fibrations by a direct compact-cube lifting construction. For a continuous homotopy on a compact parameter cube, apply the preceding projection construction to pairs of nearby data, choosing the tangent identification from [F2]. It gives normal transport defined on a neighbourhood of the diagonal and satisfying . Compactness of the homotopy image permits a common finite subdivision such that is defined for every and . Given an initial identification, define recursively on each interval. The formulas agree at subdivision times and are continuous in all source jet seminorms. This lifts the homotopy with its prescribed initial family and proves cube HLP. It also shows that normal-isomorphism loci are path-saturated. No choice of one lift for every path, or assertion of contractible gauge fibres, is needed.
These constructions also give relative compact tests, rather than just fibrewise contraction. Given an enriched family on a compact parameter manifold and an existing genuine extension on an open neighbourhood of a closed parameter subset , choose and a parameter cutoff equal to zero near and one near . Choose one small enough for the canonical family on and the step-2.1 deformation of the given extensions on . On run that deformation for the cutoff amount of time; outside use the canonical model. Near the boundary of both formulas equal the same model, so they paste continuously, smoothly for smooth families. The resulting extension has exactly the prescribed enriched restriction and equals the original extension near . Different admissible radii can be compared by decreasing both to a common smaller radius; the radial models and their interpolations remain in the common germ neighbourhood. For a disk test with a given genuine lift on its boundary, first precompose the enriched disk family with a radial parameter map homotopic to the identity relative to the boundary and constant in the inward collar coordinate near the boundary. Thus the enriched data on this collar equal their boundary values. Glue the step-2.1 homotopy of the genuine boundary lift to its canonical model along that parameter collar, and use the canonical lift of the reparametrized enriched family on the remaining inner disk. The resulting genuine family extends the boundary lift and its enriched restriction is homotopic, relative to the boundary, to the original disk family. This proves the relative lifting-up-to-homotopy tests for , so it induces isomorphisms on all homotopy groups and a bijection on components.
If the enriched derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, the commuting forgetful-fibration square descends it to . Indeed the fibre map is the identity on by step 1.4 and both vertical maps are Serre fibrations by step 2.2. The exact sequences in [F3] give the isomorphisms on base homotopy groups by the usual exact diagram chase (including the nonabelian degree-one groups). For components, the fibre-component action identifies of each total space over a fixed base component with the orbits of the same ; surjectivity on enriched components supplies every formal base component, and injectivity follows by lifting a formal base path, correcting its endpoint in the common gauge fibre, and using the enriched equivalence. Thus the base component map is a bijection as well. Each ordinary datum belongs to the locus obtained by taking to be its own normal bundle, and each path or based compact homotopy stays in that locus by step 2.2. Hence this proves descent on the full ordinary immersion and formal-immersion spaces.
Every component of is noncompact because has positive rank; its dimension is . Assuming the open-source derivative theorem [given], [F3] makes the derivative map on a weak homotopy equivalence. Its commuting restriction square has horizontal maps that are weak homotopy equivalences by steps 1.1 and 3.1, so two-of-three gives the enriched derivative equivalence. Step 3.2 then gives the ordinary closed-source derivative equivalence. This proves the reduction, with the open-source theorem as its explicit prerequisite. For empty all spaces are singleton spaces and the conclusions hold directly.
Dependency status
The reduction uses the constructively supplied open-source theorem; the normal-extension and forgetful lifting comparisons above give the closed-source descent. Normal identifications remain genuine extra data throughout the comparison. Mathematical owner adjudication is separate from local format checks.
Depends on
- Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds
- Smale–Hirsch for open source manifolds
- Normal bundle of a formal immersion
- Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity
- Formal immersion between smooth manifolds
- Space of immersions and space of formal immersions
- Disk bundles over compact bases are compact manifolds with boundary
- Whitney sums of vector bundles
- Every vector subbundle has a smooth complement
- Every smooth vector bundle admits a smooth bundle metric
- Every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space
- The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem
- Normal addition is a local diffeomorphism along the zero section
- Tubular neighbourhoods of embedded submanifolds
- Normal and conormal bundles of an embedded submanifold
- The Euclidean inverse function theorem
- Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration
- Hurewicz and serre fibrations
- Weak homotopy equivalence
- Formal-immersion homotopies extend over a collar
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
133 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lectures 5 & 6: The Hirsch–Smale theorem (notes by C. Elliott), PDF pp. 1–4: Lemma 1.1, Corollary 1.2, Lemma 1.3 (Hirsch–Smale Fibration Lemma, n > k), Theorems 1.5 and 1.7, Lemma 1.6, Lemma 1.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 3: Immersion theory (notes by O. Gwilliam), PDF pp. 1–4: Proposition 2.2 (disk), Definition 2.5 (Serre fibration), Definition 2.6 and Proposition 2.7 (flexible sheaves) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ralph L. Cohen, Bundles, Manifolds, and Homotopy, Ch. 7 §2 “Obstructions to the existence of embeddings and immersions, the Hirsch–Smale theorem”, printed pp. 226–232 (Theorem 7.5, Corollary 7.6) (standard reference, not scraped)