Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smoothing continuous families of genuine immersions

Statement

Assume ACω. Let Mm be compact, Nn smooth, m≤n, and (P,Q) a compact parameter pair. A continuous family Φ:P→Imm⁡(M,N) whose adjoint is smooth on W×M for some open W⊇Q is homotopic, through genuine families and relative to Q, to a smooth family agreeing with it on a parameter neighbourhood of Q. Every continuous path in Imm⁡(M,N) is homotopic relative to its endpoints to a smooth path. Consequently its path components are regular homotopy classes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, compact smooth Mm, smooth Nn with m≤n, a compact parameter pair (P,Q), and a weakly continuous family of immersions with adjoint φ smooth on W×M, W⊇Q.

[F1]

Local source jets of φ are jointly continuous; conversely joint jet continuity gives weak continuity (Joint jet continuity characterises the weak smooth topology).

[L1]

Under countable choice, N and the boundaryless factor P0 of P have Euclidean embeddings and smooth tubular retractions (Every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space, The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem). For e:N↪Rb write r:T→e(N) for the latter; dra is the identity on Tae(N) when a∈e(N).

[L2]

Parameter mollification by a nonnegative unit-mass bump is smooth and allows differentiation under the integral on compact source pieces; uniform continuity gives uniform approximation of values and source derivatives (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump, Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign, Differentiation under the integral sign, Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).

[L3]

Smooth bumps supported in a prescribed open set and equal to one near a compact set exist (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set); continuous strictly positive functions on nonempty compact sets have positive minima (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1L2givenconstruct

Put a=e∘φ. Extend its parameter coordinates to a Euclidean neighbourhood of P=P0×[0,1]d by the tubular projection on P0 and clamping each interval coordinate. This extension a^ is continuous with every x-derivative jointly continuous. For a nonnegative bump βδ of mass one define vδ(p,x)=∫βδ(p−y)a^(y,x) dy, taking δ below a uniform neighbourhood radius of the compact P. The result is smooth jointly in (p,x), and every x-derivative passes under the integral. Values and first x-derivatives converge uniformly to those of a on finitely many compact source chart pieces covering M.

2.1L1L3step 1.1choose

The compact family of pairs (a(p,x),dxa(p,x)) lies in the open set of ambient first jets (z,A) for which z∈T and drzA is injective. At an original pair, dradxa=dxa is injective. Nonvanishing minors and continuity of dr therefore give a uniform positive allowed error on the finitely many compact parameter-source pieces. Choose δ so that both value and first-derivative errors of v=vδ are smaller than that error. This uses the distance of the compact family from the complement of the permitted jet neighbourhood, rather than a distance from the whole, possibly noncompact, e(N) to the edge of T. No bound on ∥dr∥ away from e(N) is asserted.

3.1L1L3step 2.1construct

Choose a smooth cutoff χ:P→[0,1] supported in W and equal to one near Q, by applying [L3] in P0×Rd; for empty Q set χ=0. The map b=χa+(1−χ)v is smooth, since a is smooth on the support of χ. For s∈[0,1] set ws=(1−s)a+sb and φs=e−1r(ws). Because χ depends only on the parameter, both ws−a and dxws−dxa are (s(1−χ)) times the respective mollification errors. Thus the permitted first-jet conditions of step 2.1 hold throughout, and every φs(p,⋅) is an immersion. The homotopy starts at φ, ends at the smooth map e−1r(b), and is fixed where χ=1.

4.1F1step 1.1step 3.1

All source derivatives of φs are jointly continuous by the integral formula and smooth composition; [F1] gives a continuous homotopy of families. Empty source or parameter spaces need no smoothing. This proves the relative assertion.

5.1F1step 4.1construct∎

For an arbitrary continuous path γ, choose a smooth η:[0,1]→[0,1] equal to zero near zero and one near one. The path t↦γ(η(t)) is homotopic to γ relative to endpoints by precomposition with (1−s)t+sη(t). Its adjoint is smooth near the endpoints, where it is independent of t and equals the prescribed smooth immersion. Apply steps 1.1–4.1 with P=[0,1], Q={0,1} to produce a smooth path with exactly those endpoints. A smooth path of immersions is a regular homotopy by Regular homotopy of immersions, and every regular homotopy is weakly continuous by [F1]. Hence the component and regular-homotopy classifications agree.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

109 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources