How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative tubular neighborhoods preserve a chain of submersions
Statement
Assume AC. Let be an embedded smooth manifold and let be a finite family of smooth submersions such that is a submersion. Prescribe closed subsets , closed relative to . Suppose the maps relevant at each form a chain: on a neighborhood of , every with factors smoothly through a single maximal such map . Then a tubular retraction can be chosen so that whenever and lies sufficiently close to its zero-section point in the chosen tube. Its tube map is a smooth embedding from a variable-radius neighborhood of the normal quotient bundle. Additional prescribed positive size bounds that have a positive lower bound near every base point can be imposed on its displacement and fiber radius; in particular, positive continuous bounds are admissible. No convex average of manifold-valued retractions is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, an embedded smooth manifold , a finite family of smooth submersions with each submersive, relatively closed subsets , and the local chain factorization condition; any prescribed size bounds are locally bounded below by positive constants.
A smooth map of constant rank near a point has smooth charts near the point and near its image in which it is the standard projection (The constant-rank theorem for manifolds).
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, every open cover of a smooth manifold admits a smooth subordinate partition of unity (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).
A jointly smooth time-dependent vector field depending smoothly on finitely many parameters has local solution maps that are smooth in the initial condition and in the parameters (Smooth dependence of ODE solutions on parameters).
Assuming countable choice, an embedded smooth submanifold has a Euclidean normal tube: a positive smooth radius such that normal addition is a diffeomorphism from onto an open neighbourhood of (The Euclidean tubular neighbourhood theorem).
AC implies DC implies (AC implies DC implies countable choice), which supplies the countable-choice hypotheses of [F2] and [F4]; the ODE and constant-rank arguments are choice-free beyond that. This is the full choice use (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
Fix and put , a finite set. Since the with are closed in and avoid , and the with are open, choose a source neighbourhood that avoids every with and lies in every with ; shrink it so that the active maps factor smoothly through a single maximal map . Since is a submersion, there are ambient coordinates on a neighbourhood of with and : straighten , use [F1] on for coordinates , and then apply [F1] in the full-rank case to the map , whose differential at is invertible because is the identity at . If is empty, ordinary straightened coordinates suffice.
Put and identify it with the Euclidean orthogonal normal bundle. The -directions of the adapted charts give smooth local splittings of the quotient map whose images are vertical for every active map. Choose a locally finite smooth partition of unity on subordinate to the neighbourhoods of step 1.1. Near each chart extend its vertical coordinate fields to the ambient chart. For a parameter let be the linear combination of these fields with the -coordinates of at , multiplied by a smooth local cutoff in equal to one near the diagonal over the support of , and set . The sum is locally finite in , smooth in all variables, and linear in ; at it equals , whose quotient is because every summand splits the quotient map. Whenever , every summand of nonzero weight lies in a neighbourhood carrying that constraint, so is vertical for near .
Let be the time-one endpoint of the flow of starting at . By [F3] applied to the jointly smooth field this is defined and smooth on an open neighbourhood of the zero section: for small the field is small, and rescaling the parameter or restricting a common short-time interval gives the time-one solution. It satisfies and , because the field vanishes at and its first parameter derivative is the constant initial vector ; moreover is the identity, so the differential of at the zero section is the isomorphism . Hence is a local diffeomorphism at every point of the zero section. If , a sufficiently small parameter keeps the whole trajectory in the region where is vertical for , so there by the chain rule. All radius requirements so far are positive local requirements on .
For let be the supremum of such that is defined and injective on . It is positive: is a local diffeomorphism at each point of the zero section, and an injectivity neighbourhood of contains for sufficiently small in a local bundle trivialization. If then is eligible by restriction, and shows ; exchanging and makes 1-Lipschitz. Choose a positive smooth radius with , with whenever , and with any prescribed positive size bounds enforced; such a smooth minorant exists by [F2], summing suitably small positive constants with a subordinate partition of unity on a locally finite cover on which the required local flow, identity and size bounds have positive lower bounds; the prescribed size bounds have this property by hypothesis.
Suppose with inside this radius domain. Then , so ; also and . Both parameter points therefore lie in the eligible domain , on which is injective, so . After shrinking the radius further to stay inside the local-diffeomorphism locus, is an injective local diffeomorphism on its full variable-radius domain, hence a diffeomorphism onto an open neighbourhood of ; its inverse composed with the projection of onto defines , the tube map is exactly , and step 3.1 gives whenever and lies close enough to its zero-section point. The prescribed displacement and fiber-radius bounds were built into in step 4.1.
Remarks
- The retraction is produced by integrating an explicit normal field, not by averaging manifold-valued retractions, and the construction is relative to the prescribed closed subsets: the identity is imposed only over points of , which is exactly what the chain condition makes consistent.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Mather, Notes on Topological Stability (standard reference, not scraped)