Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth handle attachment is independent of corner rounding up to diffeomorphism

Statement

For fixed attaching and product-collar data, two compatible smooth monotone roundings of a handle attachment are diffeomorphic by an isotopy supported in that collar. The diffeomorphism is the identity outside the collar.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Attaching a smooth handle with corner rounding: Assume ACω. Let X be a smooth n-manifold with boundary. Attach the handle of def-k-handle-core-cocore-attaching-region-and-belt-sphere by a smooth embedding h:Sk1×DnkX that extends to a neighborhood of the disk factor. Form the quotient of X(Dk×Dnk) identifying z with h(z) in the attaching region. The disk coordinates trivialize the normal bundle of the attaching sphere; this framing is part of the data. Use collars from thm-collar-neighborhood-theorem to give the seam its product smooth charts, then round the compact codimension-two corner. A compatible rounding is a smooth monotone planar profile, transverse to a common diagonal direction, agreeing with the two faces away from a small corner neighborhood. In coordinates along that diagonal it is a graph. This convention fixes the gluing and collar data; changing the attaching embedding is a different question. There is no corner to round when k=0 or k=n.

[F2]

The fundamental theorem on flows: Let X be a smooth vector field on M. For each pM, let γp:IpM be the maximal integral curve through p, and set D:={(t,p)R×M:tIp},Φ(t,p):=γp(t). Then D is open in R×M, each fibre Dp is an interval containing 0, the map Φ:DM is smooth, and Φ is the unique maximal local flow generated by X.

[F3]

A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set: Let M be a smooth manifold, let KM be compact, and let WM be open with KW. Then there exists a smooth function ρ:M[0,1] that equals 1 on an open neighbourhood of K and satisfies supp(ρ)W.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

In the prescribed corner chart write the profiles as z=g0(w) and z=g1(w) along their common transverse direction. They agree outside a compact interval. The graphs gt=(1t)g0+tg1 are smooth embedded profiles with the same fixed ends. Use these graphs over the compact corner locus.

F1
2.1

Choose a smooth cutoff χ supported in the collar and equal to one near the compact union of these graphs where g1g00. The time-dependent field Vt=χ(w,z)(g1(w)g0(w))z is smooth. Along the moving graph it has exactly its velocity.

F3step 1.1
3.1

Apply the flow theorem to t+Vt on an open time interval times the doubled collar. Its solutions exist for 0t1: spatial motion is in a fixed compact set, and any finite endpoint is extendible in a coordinate neighborhood. Uniqueness gives inverse evolution and carries the initial graph to the final graph, preserving the specified side. Extend by the identity. If the corner locus is empty, the identity is already the answer.

F2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources