Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Negation scales the local index by (−1)n

Statement

Assume ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structure.

Let M be a smooth n-manifold, n≥1, and let X be a smooth vector field with an isolated zero at p (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field). Then −X has an isolated zero at p and ind⁡p(−X)=(−1)nind⁡pX.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth vector field X on the smooth n-manifold M with an isolated zero at p.

[F1]

The index is computed by the normalized field on a small sphere: for a chart with representative Xφ and admissible ε>0, ind⁡pX=deg⁡f where f(v):=Xφ(εv)/∣Xφ(εv)∣, the degree being the ordinary one for n≥2 and the reduced degree for n=1 (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field).

[F2]

The antipodal map v↦−v of Sn−1 has degree (−1)n for n≥2; the reduced degree of the antipodal map of S0 is −1=(−1)1 (Degree of identity constant reflection and antipodal sphere maps, The reduced degree of a map into the 0-sphere).

[F3]

Degree is multiplicative under composition of maps of Sn−1 for n≥2, and reduced degree is multiplicative under composition for maps into S0 (Degree is multiplicative under composition, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

The field −X vanishes exactly where X does, so p is an isolated zero of −X; in the same chart (−X)φ=−Xφ, so its normalized map is v↦−Xφ(εv)/∣Xφ(εv)∣=(α∘f)(v), where α(v)=−v is the antipodal map of Sn−1 and f is the normalized map of X.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

For n≥2 multiplicativity of the degree under composition gives ind⁡p(−X)=deg⁡α⋅deg⁡f=(−1)nind⁡pX by [F2], and for n=1 the same computation with reduced degrees gives ind⁡p(−X)=(−1)1ind⁡pX, since (−1)n=(−1)1 for n=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources