Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Small-time flow fixed point indices and vector field zero indices

Statement

Assume countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) as in the vector-field index suppliers. Let M be a smooth n-manifold without boundary, n≥1, and let X be a smooth vector field on M with an isolated zero at p (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field).

(i) Tangent families. Let t↦ft be a smooth family of maps defined on a neighbourhood of p with f0=id, tangent to X at time zero, i.e. ddt∣t=0ft(x)=X(x) for every x, and suppose that there is a neighbourhood of p in which, for every sufficiently small t≠0, the point p is the only fixed point of ft. Then ind⁡p(ft)=(−1)nind⁡pX(t>0),ind⁡p(f−t)=ind⁡pX(t>0).

(ii) The flow at a nondegenerate zero. The local flow φ of X (Local and global flows generated by a vector field, Integral curves of a vector field) is such a family; if the zero p is nondegenerate (Nondegenerate zero of a vector field), then the isolation hypothesis of (i) holds for every sufficiently small t≠0, so the two displayed identities hold for φt: the small-time flow at a nondegenerate zero satisfies ind⁡p(φt)=(−1)nind⁡pX for t>0 and ind⁡p(φ−t)=ind⁡pX for t>0.

The sign (−1)n is the consistent short-time sign: the displacement id−ft is asymptotic to −tX near a zero, so the two local indices differ by the sign of −id on Rn.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth n-manifold M without boundary, n≥1, a smooth vector field X with isolated zero p; in (i) a tangent family ft as in the statement, in (ii) the local flow φt of X.

[F1]

On a smooth chart ball B around p on which X vanishes only at p, the flow satisfies the integral identity φt(x)=x+∫0tX(φs(x)) ds and depends smoothly on (t,x); hence φ^t(u)=u+tX~(u)+t2r(t,u) with r smooth near (0,0), where φ^t and X~ are the chart representatives. More generally, a smooth family t↦ft with f0=id and ddt∣t=0ft(x)=X(x) satisfies f^t(u)=u+tX~(u)+t2r(t,u) with r smooth, and then f^−t(u)=u−tX~(u)+t2r−(t,u) with r− smooth, because ddt∣t=0f−t(x)=−X(x); this is the fundamental theorem of calculus applied twice to each coordinate (Local existence, uniqueness, and smooth dependence for manifold integral curves, Local and global flows generated by a vector field).

[F2]

The local fixed point index ind⁡p(φt) is the degree of the normalized chart displacement v↦(u−φ^t(u))(εv)/∣⋅∣ on Sn−1, independent of admissible smooth chart and radius (Isolated fixed point and local fixed point index, The local fixed point index is independent of chart, ball and neighbourhood); the local index of a smooth vector field with isolated zero is the same degree of its normalized chart representative, independent of smooth chart, ball and admissible trivialization (Isolated zero and local index of a vector field, The local index is independent of chart, ball and trivialization). Degree, and in dimension zero the reduced degree, is invariant under homotopies of maps of spheres (Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy, Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).

[F3]

Negation multiplies the local index of a vector field by (−1)n (Negation scales the local index by (−1)n), and for a nondegenerate zero the index is sign⁡det⁡DXp (Nondegenerate zero of a vector field, The index of a nondegenerate vector-field zero).

[F4]

The inverse function theorem: a smooth map of Euclidean open sets with invertible differential at a point is a local diffeomorphism there, and the manifold form applies in charts (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

The expansion. Work in a smooth chart (φ,U) at p with φ(p)=0, write X~ for the chart representative of X and f^t for the chart representative of a family as in (i) or of the flow. By [F1], f^t(u)=u+tX~(u)+t2r(t,u) and f^−t(u)=u−tX~(u)+t2r−(t,u) with r,r− smooth near (0,0); for the flow, φ^t(0)=0 for all t, so the expansion gives t2r(t,0)=0 and hence r(t,0)=0 near t=0. Choose ε>0 with X~≠0 on 0<∣u∣≤ε; then c:=min⁡∣u∣=ε∣X~(u)∣>0.

2.1step 1.1F2F3

The index identities for a tangent family. Let the family of (i) satisfy its isolation hypothesis on a neighbourhood containing the closed ball ∣u∣≤ε. For small t>0 the normalized displacement v↦(u−f^t(u))(εv)/∣(u−f^t(u))(εv)∣ is defined, and by step 1.1 it equals (−X~(εv)−tr(t,εv))/∣−X~(εv)−tr(t,εv)∣. Since ∣X~∣≥c on the sphere and r is bounded there, for ∣t∣ small every vector −X~(εv)−str(t,εv), s∈[0,1], has norm at least c/2>0; hence the straight-line homotopy in s is one of nowhere-zero maps of Sn−1, and [F2] gives ind⁡p(ft)=deg⁡(v↦−X~(εv)/∣X~(εv)∣)=(−1)nind⁡pX by [F3]. The same computation with f^−t gives ind⁡p(f−t)=deg⁡(X~/∣X~∣)=ind⁡pX, again by [F2] and [F3].

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2F4∎

The flow at a nondegenerate zero. The flow is tangent to X at time zero and fixes p, so it satisfies all hypotheses of (i) except possibly the isolation one. Suppose p is nondegenerate, so that DX~0 is invertible, and consider G(t,u):=(t,X~(u)+tr(t,u)) near (0,0); its differential at (0,0) is block triangular with diagonal blocks 1 and DX~0, hence invertible. By [F4] G is a local diffeomorphism at (0,0), so there are α,β>0 such that for ∣t∣<α every solution of X~(u)+tr(t,u)=0 with ∣u∣<β is unique; the fixed points of φt in the chart are exactly these solutions, and u=0 is one of them because r(t,0)=0 by step 1.1. Therefore for every 0<∣t∣<α the point p is the only fixed point of φt in the ball ∣u∣<β, the isolation hypothesis of (i) holds, and step 2.1 applied to φt gives ind⁡p(φt)=(−1)nind⁡pX and ind⁡p(φ−t)=ind⁡pX. No orientation of M is used, and no further choice is used after the vector-field index suppliers.

The common isolating neighbourhood in (i) must be checked for a tangent family. For X(u)=u3 on R and ft(u)=u+tu3−t2u, one has f0=id and ∂tft∣t=0=X, but for t>0 the fixed points are 0,t,−t. They approach the isolated zero 0, so no common isolating neighbourhood works for all small positive t. Part (ii) establishes the required common neighbourhood for the stated nondegenerate flow case. The normal-projection family in the Poincare–Hopf remark supplies it directly for arbitrary isolated zeros.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources