Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lefschetz fixed point theorem

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice). Let M be a closed smooth manifold and let f:M→M be continuous. If L(f)≠0 (Algebraic Lefschetz number via rational homology traces), then f has a fixed point. No converse is asserted: L(f)=0 does not force f to be fixed-point-free, as the companion counterexample shows.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a closed smooth manifold M and a continuous self-map f.

[F1]

Under countable choice, M admits a proper smooth Euclidean embedding (The weak Whitney proper embedding theorem) and its closed image S has an open neighbourhood U with smooth retraction r:U→S (A closed Euclidean submanifold has a smooth neighborhood retraction). AC implies the required countable choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

A continuous Euclidean-valued map has a smooth approximation within any positive continuous error bound (Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps).

[F4]

Homotopic self-maps have the same Lefschetz number (The Lefschetz number is a homotopy invariant). A smooth fixed-point-free self-map in positive dimension has L=I=0, by Lefschetz-Hopf index formula and the empty-sum convention of Geometric Lefschetz number (index sum). The trace definition is Algebraic Lefschetz number via rational homology traces.

[F5]

Singular chains are finite formal sums of continuous simplices (Singular simplices and singular chain groups with coefficients).

Proof

1.1givenF4F5cases

Prove the contrapositive, assuming f has no fixed point. If M is empty, its homology groups and L(f) are zero. If dim⁡M=0, compactness makes the discrete manifold finite. Every singular simplex is constant; in each point summand its boundary is multiplication by ∑j=0k(−1)j, which is one for positive even k and zero for odd k. Thus homology is zero in positive degrees and H0 has the point basis. The matrix of f∗ on this basis has a diagonal one exactly at a fixed point, so its trace is zero. Hence L(f)=0. Assume now M≠∅ and dim⁡M≥1.

1.2givenF1F3

Embed M by e as S⊂RN and take r:U→S from [F1]. Write F=e∘f. The function x↦∥e(x)−F(x)∥ is continuous and positive, so [F3] gives a minimum d>0. Choose b>0 such that the closed b-neighbourhood K of S lies in U: finitely many open balls whose doubled balls lie in U cover compact S, and the minimum of their radii supplies such a b after shrinking. The set K is compact by Euclidean closedness and boundedness. Continuity of r on K supplies η>0, with η<b, such that ∥y−z∥<η for y,z∈K implies ∥r(y)−r(z)∥<d/2: cover K by neighbourhood balls on which oscillation is less than d/4, take a finite cover by their half-sized balls, and use the minimum half-radius.

2.1step 1.2F1F2construct

By [F2], choose smooth A:M→RN with ∥A(x)−F(x)∥<η for every x. The segments (1−t)F(x)+tA(x) lie in K⊂U, so H(t,x)=e−1r((1−t)F(x)+tA(x)) is a continuous homotopy from f to the smooth self-map g=e−1rA. Moreover ∥e(g(x))−F(x)∥=∥r(A(x))−r(F(x))∥<d/2 since r(F(x))=F(x). Thus ∥e(x)−e(g(x))∥>d/2, and g is fixed-point-free.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4∎

By [F4], L(g)=0 and L(f)=L(g), proving the contrapositive and hence the fixed-point theorem for every closed smooth manifold. AC supplies the approximation and embedding hypotheses as well as those of the index formula.

Remarks

The converse fails: the identity of a positive-dimensional closed manifold with Euler characteristic zero has L=0 and fixes every point. The companion counterexample has two isolated fixed points with canceling indices.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

100 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources