Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The index of a nondegenerate fixed point is the sign of det(I-Df)

Statement

Let M be a smooth n-manifold without boundary, n≥1, and let x be a nondegenerate fixed point of a smooth map f:M→M (Nondegenerate fixed point). Then ind⁡x(f)=sign⁡det⁡(I−Dfx:TxM→TxM)∈{+1,−1}, so every nondegenerate fixed point has index +1 or −1. The convention is I−Dfx, not Dfx−I; in the other ordering the value is multiplied by (−1)n, which is the source of sign discrepancies between references.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth n-manifold without boundary, n≥1, and a nondegenerate fixed point x of the smooth self-map f.

[F1]

The index is the degree of the normalized chart displacement, with reduced degree for n=1, independent of chart and admissible radius (Isolated fixed point and local fixed point index, The local fixed point index is independent of chart, ball and neighbourhood).

[F2]

Nondegeneracy means I−Dfx is invertible (Nondegenerate fixed point). In a chart at x, the chain rule identifies the derivative of g(u)=u−f^(u) with the conjugate A=I−Df^0 of I−Dfx (The differential of a smooth map, The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps), and differentiability gives g(u)=Au+o(∣u∣) (Multivariable Taylor formula with o(∥h∥k) remainder, k=1, componentwise).

[F3]

Degree is invariant under smooth homotopies of connected spheres (Degree is invariant under proper smooth homotopy) and an orientation-preserving or reversing sphere diffeomorphism has degree +1 or −1 (Degree of an orientation-preserving or reversing diffeomorphism). For n=1 use reduced-degree homotopy invariance (Reduced degree into the 0-sphere is homotopy invariant and multiplicative).

Proof

1.1givenF2

Choose a chart centered at x and a closed ball on which the chart displacement g is defined. By [F2], g(u)=Au+R(u) with A invertible and R(u)=o(∣u∣). Let c=∥A−1∥−1>0 and shrink the ball until ∣R(u)∣≤c∣u∣/2 there. Then ∣Au∣≥c∣u∣, so g has no zero in the punctured ball and a positive radius ε in it is admissible.

2.1step 1.1F1F3

For v∈Sn−1 and t∈[0,1], the vector Aεv+tR(εv) has norm at least cε/2>0. Its normalization is a smooth homotopy from LA(v)=Av/∣Av∣ to the sphere map defining the fixed-point index. Therefore [F1] and [F3] identify ind⁡x(f) with deg⁡LA, using reduced degree for n=1.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F3∎

The inverse of LA is LA−1. For n≥2, radial normalization subtracts only an outward-normal component from Aw on tangent vectors w, then rescales by a positive scalar. Thus, in outward-normal-first sphere orientations, the orientation sign of dLA is sign⁡det⁡A: the ambient ordered frame (v,w1,…,wn−1) is sent to (Av,Aw1,…,Awn−1), and deleting normal components and positive rescaling leave its determinant sign unchanged. By [F3], deg⁡LA=sign⁡det⁡A. For n=1, LA(v)=sign⁡(A)v, of reduced degree sign⁡(A) directly from [F1]. Finally A is conjugate to I−Dfx, so their determinant signs agree. Hence ind⁡x(f)=sign⁡det⁡(I−Dfx)∈{+1,−1}. This local-coordinate proof uses no orientation of M and no choice principle.

Remarks

  • Sign convention. With the opposite ordering, det⁡(Dfx−I)=(−1)ndet⁡(I−Dfx) by multilinearity of the determinant in the columns of an n×n matrix, so a reference that uses dfx−I reports (−1)n times the index defined here. Guillemin and Pollack use that ordering; the displacement convention here is fixed throughout the proof.
  • Isolatedness is not enough. The formula needs the invertibility of I−Dfx; for a degenerate isolated fixed point the index is still defined, but it is not determined by the first derivative. See Isolated fixed points need not be nondegenerate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources