How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Skeletal homology stabilizes away from the cell dimension
Statement
Let be a CW complex, let be an abelian group, and let . The skeletal inclusion induces an isomorphism for and a surjection for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A CW complex , an abelian coefficient group , and the consecutive-skeleton pair .
Proof
Its relative homology vanishes outside degree by Relative homology of consecutive CW skeleta.
In the pair long exact sequence, the two relative groups adjacent to vanish for , and only the outgoing one need vanish for ; exactness gives respectively an isomorphism and a surjection.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)