How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homology of an infinite CW complex is the colimit of skeletal homology
Statement
For a CW complex , the natural map is an isomorphism for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A singular cycle or a singular bounding chain in .
Proof
A singular chain has finitely many simplices, so its image is compact; The image of a compact space lies in a finite CW subcomplex places it in one finite subcomplex and hence in some skeleton. Thus every homology class is in the image.
If a class from dies in , a finite singular bounding chain has compact image and lies in some . It already kills the class there, proving injectivity of the colimit map.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Appendix A (standard reference, not scraped)