Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Singular state covariance with positive innovation covariance

Example

Take T=1 with scalar state and observation, X0∼N1(0,1), F1=0, Q1=0, H1=1, and R1=1. Let q1∼N1(0,0)=δ0 and let r1∼N1(0,1) be independent of X0. Then X1=F1X0+q1=0 and Y1=H1X1+r1=r1.

With no earlier observations, define the predicted state mean m1∣0:=E[X1], the state prediction covariance P1∣0:=Var⁡(X1), the observation prediction residual v1:=Y1−H1m1∣0, and its innovation covariance S1:=Var⁡(v1). Then P1∣0 is singular while S1 is positive definite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-step scalar model in the Example.

[A1]

AC is required by the multivariate-normal and finite path-law suppliers. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

The linear-Gaussian model permits positive-semidefinite initial, process-noise, and observation-noise covariance matrices. (Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises)

[F2]

The finite linear-Gaussian path law exists and may have singular covariance. (The finite linear-Gaussian state-space path is jointly Gaussian)

[F3]

A law Nd(m,Σ) has mean m and covariance Σ; singular covariance is allowed. (Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance)

[F4]

Variance of a square-integrable real random variable is its centered second moment. (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space)

[F5]

The finite-horizon kernel model has the ordered joint law stated in its definition. (Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique)

[F6]

A scalar normal law with zero variance is the point mass at its mean. (Standard normal and normal laws)

Verification

Given: F1=0, Q1=0, H1=1, R1=1, X0∼N1(0,1), q1∼N1(0,0)=δ0, and independent r1∼N1(0,1).

1.1A1F1F2F4F5F6givenalgebra

By [F6], q1∼N1(0,0)=δ0, hence q1=0 almost surely. These parameters satisfy the linear-Gaussian contract, and the finite path law exists by [F2,F5]. The recursion gives X1=0, so m1∣0=0 and P1∣0=E[(X1−m1∣0)2]=0 by [F4]. The 1×1 zero matrix is singular.

2.1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Since Y1=r1, the residual is v1=Y1−H1m1∣0=r1. Its mean is zero and its variance is E[r12]=1 by [F3,F4]. Hence S1=[1] is positive definite, since uTS1u=u2>0 for every nonzero u∈R.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Thus P1∣0=0 is singular while S1=[1] is positive definite. No inverse of the state covariance is used; the observation innovation covariance remains invertible.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources