How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Singular state covariance with positive innovation covariance
Example
Take with scalar state and observation, , , , , and . Let and let be independent of . Then and .
With no earlier observations, define the predicted state mean , the state prediction covariance , the observation prediction residual , and its innovation covariance . Then is singular while is positive definite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-step scalar model in the Example.
AC is required by the multivariate-normal and finite path-law suppliers. (The Axiom of Choice)
The linear-Gaussian model permits positive-semidefinite initial, process-noise, and observation-noise covariance matrices. (Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises)
The finite linear-Gaussian path law exists and may have singular covariance. (The finite linear-Gaussian state-space path is jointly Gaussian)
A law has mean and covariance ; singular covariance is allowed. (Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance)
Variance of a square-integrable real random variable is its centered second moment. (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space)
The finite-horizon kernel model has the ordered joint law stated in its definition. (Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique)
A scalar normal law with zero variance is the point mass at its mean. (Standard normal and normal laws)
Verification
Given: , , , , , , and independent .
By [F6], , hence almost surely. These parameters satisfy the linear-Gaussian contract, and the finite path law exists by [F2,F5]. The recursion gives , so and by [F4]. The zero matrix is singular.
Since , the residual is . Its mean is zero and its variance is by [F3,F4]. Hence is positive definite, since for every nonzero .
Thus is singular while is positive definite. No inverse of the state covariance is used; the observation innovation covariance remains invertible.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance
- Standard normal and normal laws
- Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique
- The finite linear-Gaussian state-space path is jointly Gaussian
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicolai Meinshausen, Time Series Analysis: Notes for the course HS 2022 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dewei Wang, STAT 720 Time Series Analysis, Spring 2015 lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)