How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Correcting one corrupted table entry
Example
On , let , and let agree with except that . Thus . At every fixed nonzero , the two-query corrector succeeds with probability exactly ; it fails exactly for seeds and . At it always returns zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
At distance delta<1/4 from a linear function, the two-query corrector succeeds at every point with probability at least 1-2delta, and that nearby linear function is unique (Pointwise correctness under less than quarter noise).
Verification
There are eight cube points, with precisely the zero point corrupted, so . The self-correction theorem gives a unique nearby linear function and success at least at each point.
For fixed , the query is corrupted exactly when , and the query is corrupted exactly when . These are distinct seeds. At either seed exactly one summand is flipped, so the output is wrong; at the other six seeds neither is flipped and linearity gives the right answer. At , the sum is zero for every seed, equal to . Thus the lower bound is attained for nonzero requests and exceeded for the zero request.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity, January 2007 web draft, §18.4.1 Local decoding pp.364–365 (standard reference, not scraped)