How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pointwise correctness under less than quarter noise
Statement
Let and suppose a fixed has distance from a linear function . Then is the unique linear function at distance less than from . At every fixed requested point , the two-query corrector outputs with probability at least , using two oracle calls and random bits.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
The corrector samples uniform y and returns f(y)+f(x+y) with two queries and n random bits (Two-query linear self-correction).
Distinct linear Boolean functions disagree at exactly half of the cube points (Character orthogonality, inversion and Parseval).
Proof
If another linear function had distance less than from , each point where would be a disagreement of at least one of them with . Counting these points gives , contradicting their exact half-distance. Thus the nearby linear function is unique.
Let , of size . For fixed , both and are uniform, since translation is a bijection. Thus each event , has probability . The indicator of their union is at most their indicator sum, so with probability at least neither event occurs. Independence of these two locations is unnecessary.
On that event the output is by linearity. The sampling and calls are exactly those of the corrector. For , the two queried values are identical and their sum is always zero, which equals . For , the hypothesis forces on the singleton cube; the same algorithm uses zero random bits. Zero noise gives success one for every point; the excluded endpoint would give only the lower bound one half.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora and Barak, Computational Complexity, January 2007 web draft, §18.4.1 Local decoding pp.364–365 (standard reference, not scraped)