How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A proper localization is flat but need not be faithfully flat
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.
The localization map
is flat but not faithfully flat.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the localization map .
Every localization is flat (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness).
Faithful flatness is equivalent to preserving proper ideals under extension (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).
Verification
By [L1], is flat over .
The proper ideal becomes the unit ideal after localization, since is invertible in . Thus . By [L2], the map is not faithfully flat.
So a proper localization can be flat without being faithfully flat.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, §11 (standard reference, not scraped)