Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Flatness and Faithful Flatness — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples show the abstract flatness criteria in the smallest standard families: polynomial algebras, localizations, fraction fields, product-ring quotients by idempotents, nilpotent quotients that fail flatness, principal-open faithfully flat covers, and the residue-basis lifting that turns finite flat local modules into free ones in the Noetherian case written on the companion page.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A polynomial algebra is free and therefore faithfully flat over its coefficient ring

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.

For any commutative ring R, the polynomial algebra R[x] is a free R-module with basis 1,x,x2,. Hence R[x] is flat over R, and the map RR[x] is faithfully flat because the extension of any proper ideal IR is the proper ideal IR[x].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a commutative ring R.

[L2]

A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when proper ideals remain proper (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

As an R-module, R[x]=n0Rxn, so it is free on the monomial basis. By [L1], it is flat over R.

L1given
1.2

If IR, then every polynomial in IR[x] has all coefficients in I, so 1IR[x]. Thus IR[x] is proper. By [L2], the map RR[x] is faithfully flat.

L2algebra
2.1

Therefore polynomial algebras give basic faithfully flat examples.

algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A proper localization is flat but need not be faithfully flat

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.

The localization map

ZZ ⁣[12]

is flat but not faithfully flat.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the localization map ZZ[1/2].

[L2]

Faithful flatness is equivalent to preserving proper ideals under extension (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], Z[1/2] is flat over Z.

L1given
1.2

The proper ideal (2)Z becomes the unit ideal after localization, since 2 is invertible in Z[1/2]. Thus (2)Z[1/2]=Z[1/2]. By [L2], the map is not faithfully flat.

L2
2.1

So a proper localization can be flat without being faithfully flat.

algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A fraction field is flat over its domain and may fail to be projective

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the direct-summand characterization below.

Let R=Z and K=Q. Then K is the localization S1Z with S=Z{0}, so K is flat over Z. It is not projective over Z, because otherwise it would be flat and a direct summand of a free abelian group; but no nonzero direct summand of a free abelian group is divisible, whereas Q is divisible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the inclusion ZQ.

[L3]

Under the Axiom of Choice, a projective module is a direct summand of a free module (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Since Q is the localization of Z at the nonzero integers, [L1] gives that Q is flat over Z.

L1given
1.2

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If Q were projective, [L3] would make it a direct summand of a free abelian group. Every direct summand of a free abelian group is reduced, while Q is nonzero and divisible. Hence Q is not projective.

L3algebra
2.1

Thus a fraction field can be flat without being projective.

algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A quotient by an idempotent ideal is flat

Example

Let R=A×B and let I=A×0=R(1,0). Then (1,0) is idempotent, so the quotient

R/I0×BB

is a flat R-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A product ring R=A×B and the ideal I=A×0.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The element e=(1,0)A×B satisfies e2=e, and I=Re.

givenalgebra
1.2

Therefore [L1] applies and shows that R/I is flat. Concretely, R/IB as the second factor.

L1
2.1

This is the standard idempotent-quotient example.

algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The quotient by a nonidempotent ideal is not flat

Example

In R=k[ε]/(ε2), the quotient by the ideal I=(ε) is not flat.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the ring R=k[ε]/(ε2), and the ideal I=(ε).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Here I2=(ε2)=0, while I0. So II2.

givenalgebra
1.2

By [L1], the quotient R/I cannot be flat. Equivalently, the ideal criterion [L2] fails for the inclusion IR after tensoring with R/I.

L1L2
2.1

Thus quotients by nonidempotent ideals need not be flat.

algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A finite product of principal localizations covering the spectrum is faithfully flat

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.

Let f1,,fnR generate the unit ideal. Then the product map

Ri=1nRfi

is faithfully flat.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring R, and elements f1,,fnR with (f1,,fn)=R.

[L1]

Each localization Rfi is flat over R (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness).

[L2]

A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when proper ideals remain proper (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Each factor Rfi is flat by [L1], so the product ring iRfi is flat over R because finite direct products are finite direct sums as modules.

L1givenalgebra
1.2

Let IR be proper. If IiRfi=iRfi, then for every i some power of fi lies in I, because 1IRfi implies fimiI for some mi. Since the fi generate the unit ideal, so do the powers fimi, forcing 1I, contradiction. Thus the extended ideal is proper.

L2algebra
2.1

By [L2], the product map is faithfully flat.

L2
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01Open item page →

A residue-field basis lifts to a basis of a finite flat module over a local ring

Example

Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local ring and let M be a finite flat R-module. If xˉ1,,xˉr is a basis of the residue vector space M/mM, then any lifts x1,,xrM form an R-basis of M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian local ring (R,m), a finite flat R-module M, a basis xˉ1,,xˉr of M/mM, and lifts x1,,xrM.

[L1]

A finite flat module over a Noetherian local ring is free (A finite flat module over a local ring is free).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the module M is free of rank r, because the residue vector-space dimension equals the rank of a free module.

L1given
1.2

The chosen lifts generate M by Nakayama, and a generating set of size equal to the rank of a free module is automatically a basis. Therefore x1,,xr is an R-basis of M.

algebra
2.1

So residue-field bases lift to actual bases in the finite flat local case.

algebra

Sources