How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flatness and Faithful Flatness — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
These examples show the abstract flatness criteria in the smallest standard families: polynomial algebras, localizations, fraction fields, product-ring quotients by idempotents, nilpotent quotients that fail flatness, principal-open faithfully flat covers, and the residue-basis lifting that turns finite flat local modules into free ones in the Noetherian case written on the companion page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A polynomial algebra is free and therefore faithfully flat over its coefficient ring
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.
For any commutative ring , the polynomial algebra is a free -module with basis . Hence is flat over , and the map is faithfully flat because the extension of any proper ideal is the proper ideal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a commutative ring .
Free modules are flat (Under the stated choice boundary, free modules are projective and hence flat).
A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when proper ideals remain proper (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).
Verification
As an -module, so it is free on the monomial basis. By [L1], it is flat over .
If , then every polynomial in has all coefficients in , so . Thus is proper. By [L2], the map is faithfully flat.
Therefore polynomial algebras give basic faithfully flat examples.
A proper localization is flat but need not be faithfully flat
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.
The localization map
is flat but not faithfully flat.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the localization map .
Every localization is flat (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness).
Faithful flatness is equivalent to preserving proper ideals under extension (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).
Verification
By [L1], is flat over .
The proper ideal becomes the unit ideal after localization, since is invertible in . Thus . By [L2], the map is not faithfully flat.
So a proper localization can be flat without being faithfully flat.
A fraction field is flat over its domain and may fail to be projective
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the direct-summand characterization below.
Let and . Then is the localization with , so is flat over . It is not projective over , because otherwise it would be flat and a direct summand of a free abelian group; but no nonzero direct summand of a free abelian group is divisible, whereas is divisible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the inclusion .
Localizations are flat (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness).
Under the Axiom of Choice, a projective module is a direct summand of a free module (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).
Verification
Since is the localization of at the nonzero integers, [L1] gives that is flat over .
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If were projective, [L3] would make it a direct summand of a free abelian group. Every direct summand of a free abelian group is reduced, while is nonzero and divisible. Hence is not projective.
Thus a fraction field can be flat without being projective.
A quotient by an idempotent ideal is flat
Example
Let and let . Then is idempotent, so the quotient
is a flat -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A product ring and the ideal .
Quotients by idempotent-generated ideals are flat (If is flat then , and for finitely generated this is equivalent to generation by an idempotent).
Verification
The element satisfies , and .
Therefore [L1] applies and shows that is flat. Concretely, as the second factor.
This is the standard idempotent-quotient example.
The quotient by a nonidempotent ideal is not flat
Example
In , the quotient by the ideal is not flat.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the ring , and the ideal .
Flatness is detected by the ideal-injection criterion (Flatness is equivalent to preserving injections and to the ideal and finitely generated ideal tests).
Verification
Here , while . So .
By [L1], the quotient cannot be flat. Equivalently, the ideal criterion [L2] fails for the inclusion after tensoring with .
Thus quotients by nonidempotent ideals need not be flat.
A finite product of principal localizations covering the spectrum is faithfully flat
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the faithfully-flat characterization used below.
Let generate the unit ideal. Then the product map
is faithfully flat.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a commutative ring , and elements with .
Each localization is flat over (Every localization is flat, and localizing a flat module preserves flatness).
A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when proper ideals remain proper (A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra).
Verification
Each factor is flat by [L1], so the product ring is flat over because finite direct products are finite direct sums as modules.
Let be proper. If , then for every some power of lies in , because implies for some . Since the generate the unit ideal, so do the powers , forcing , contradiction. Thus the extended ideal is proper.
By [L2], the product map is faithfully flat.
A residue-field basis lifts to a basis of a finite flat module over a local ring
Example
Let be a Noetherian local ring and let be a finite flat -module. If is a basis of the residue vector space , then any lifts form an -basis of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian local ring , a finite flat -module , a basis of , and lifts .
A finite flat module over a Noetherian local ring is free (A finite flat module over a local ring is free).
Verification
By [L1], the module is free of rank , because the residue vector-space dimension equals the rank of a free module.
The chosen lifts generate by Nakayama, and a generating set of size equal to the rank of a free module is automatically a basis. Therefore is an -basis of .
So residue-field bases lift to actual bases in the finite flat local case.
Sources
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Exercise (9.8)
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, §11
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, §9
- Allen B. Altman and Steven L. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, Exercise (9.9)
- Mihnea Mustata, Graduate Commutative Algebra, §10
- J. S. Milne, A Primer of Commutative Algebra, Proposition 11.22
- Stacks Project, Section 10.78: Finite projective modules