How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Naturality of the balance isomorphism
Example
For maps M' -> M and N -> N' draw the square of projective and injective Ext computations and verify that both routes agree through the total-complex comparison.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Morphisms and and supplied projective and injective resolution comparison maps lifting them.
Verification
Precomposition by the projective comparison for and postcomposition by the injective comparison for define a morphism of first-quadrant Hom double complexes . It commutes with both and .
The induced map on the total complex restricts on the projective edge and the injective edge to the usual maps on their Hom complexes. Passing to cohomology makes the two edge-to-total quasi-isomorphism squares commute; therefore the balance isomorphism intertwines for every .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)