How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Ext balance isomorphism is natural in both variables
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and the supplied resolution hypotheses of the balance theorem. For every , the balance maps are natural in both and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Morphisms and in the resolved class.
Proof
Choose the projective and injective comparison maps for and . Projective-resolution Ext has the stated bifunctor variance and Injective-resolution Ext has the stated bifunctor variance give the two routes around the naturality square.
The chosen comparison maps induce a morphism of Hom double complexes. Because its squares with the projective augmentation and the injective coaugmentation commute, both edge-to-total quasi-isomorphisms commute with it. Taking cohomology makes the balance square commute. The independence lemma removes the chosen comparison maps, proving naturality in both variables.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)