How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two Ext long exact sequences agree under balance
Statement
Assume Dependent Choice. Let be abelian with enough projectives and injectives and supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. The balance maps commute with the connecting maps in either variable, for every . Here the connecting maps are those obtained from the short exact Hom complexes and the horseshoe constructions, transported to the supplied resolutions by comparison maps. Thus they identify the two long exact Ext sequences, with the degree-zero identification to Hom.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated resolution data and a short exact sequence in either variable.
The two edge maps into are quasi-isomorphisms, and their cohomology ratio is balance (Projective and injective constructions of Ext agree for supplied resolutions); these maps commute with resolution comparisons (The Ext balance isomorphism is natural in both variables).
Under DC, projective horseshoes are degreewise split short exact sequences of resolutions; dualizing gives the same assertion for injective horseshoes (The horseshoe lemma for projective resolutions, The horseshoe lemma for injective resolutions).
Connecting maps commute with maps of short exact sequences of cochain complexes (Naturality of the cohomology connecting morphism). The derived connecting maps are formed with horseshoes and transported to the supplied data (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, The long exact Ext sequence in the second variable, The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable).
Proof
For , fix and choose an injective horseshoe . There are three short exact sequences of cochain complexes: , , and , where denotes the three terms of the short exact sequence, not cochain degree. The first is exact by projectivity of each ; the second and third are exact because the horseshoe is split in each degree, and total diagonals are finite. The coaugmentations and augmentation give two morphisms of short exact sequences from the edge sequences to the total sequence.
For , fix and choose a projective horseshoe . The three short exact sequences are , , and , all ordered with double-prime first and prime last. The first and third are exact by the degreewise splitting; the second is exact by injectivity of each . Again the augmentation and coaugmentation give morphisms from both edge sequences to the total sequence.
In each case let be the projective-edge map to the total and the injective-edge map. By [F3], and commute with the connecting maps of their respective sequences and the total sequence. They are isomorphisms by [F1]. Hence also commutes with connecting maps. These are the actual balance maps, not merely some degreewise natural isomorphism. The total differential is ; both edge maps are cochain maps with the page's unsigned Hom differentials, so these are commuting squares with no additional sign.
The horseshoe middle resolutions may differ from the fixed ones. Transport their cohomology to the supplied data by comparison isomorphisms. By [F3] this is exactly how the derived connecting maps are defined, and [F1] makes balance commute with these comparisons. Therefore the squares proved in step 2.1 hold for the supplied resolutions as well. In degree zero both augmentations identify the common cocycles with Hom, giving its identity identification.
Depends on
- Projective and injective constructions of Ext agree for supplied resolutions
- The Ext balance isomorphism is natural in both variables
- The long exact Ext sequence in the second variable
- The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable
- The horseshoe lemma for projective resolutions
- The horseshoe lemma for injective resolutions
- Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor
- Naturality of the cohomology connecting morphism
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)