Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The two Ext long exact sequences agree under balance

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice. Let A be abelian with enough projectives and injectives and supplied projective and injective resolution data on all objects. The balance maps βn:ExtPnExtIn commute with the connecting maps in either variable, for every n0. Here the connecting maps are those obtained from the short exact Hom complexes and the horseshoe constructions, transported to the supplied resolutions by comparison maps. Thus they identify the two long exact Ext sequences, with the degree-zero identification to Hom.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated resolution data and a short exact sequence in either variable.

[F1]

The two edge maps into T(P,I)=TotHom(P,I) are quasi-isomorphisms, and their cohomology ratio is balance (Projective and injective constructions of Ext agree for supplied resolutions); these maps commute with resolution comparisons (The Ext balance isomorphism is natural in both variables).

[F2]

Under DC, projective horseshoes are degreewise split short exact sequences of resolutions; dualizing gives the same assertion for injective horseshoes (The horseshoe lemma for projective resolutions, The horseshoe lemma for injective resolutions).

[F3]

Connecting maps commute with maps of short exact sequences of cochain complexes (Naturality of the cohomology connecting morphism). The derived connecting maps are formed with horseshoes and transported to the supplied data (Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor, The long exact Ext sequence in the second variable, The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For 0NNN0, fix PM and choose an injective horseshoe 0III0. There are three short exact sequences of cochain complexes: Hom(P,N), Hom(M,I), and T(P,I), where denotes the three terms of the short exact sequence, not cochain degree. The first is exact by projectivity of each Pp; the second and third are exact because the horseshoe is split in each degree, and total diagonals are finite. The coaugmentations and augmentation give two morphisms of short exact sequences from the edge sequences to the total sequence.

F1F2givenconstruct
1.2

For 0MMM0, fix NI and choose a projective horseshoe 0PPP0. The three short exact sequences are Hom(P,N), Hom(M,I), and T(P,I), all ordered with double-prime first and prime last. The first and third are exact by the degreewise splitting; the second is exact by injectivity of each Iq. Again the augmentation and coaugmentation give morphisms from both edge sequences to the total sequence.

F1F2givenconstruct
2.1

In each case let a be the projective-edge map to the total and b the injective-edge map. By [F3], H(a) and H(b) commute with the connecting maps of their respective sequences and the total sequence. They are isomorphisms by [F1]. Hence β=H(b)1H(a) also commutes with connecting maps. These are the actual balance maps, not merely some degreewise natural isomorphism. The total differential is h+(1)pv; both edge maps are cochain maps with the page's unsigned Hom differentials, so these are commuting squares with no additional sign.

F1F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

The horseshoe middle resolutions may differ from the fixed ones. Transport their cohomology to the supplied data by comparison isomorphisms. By [F3] this is exactly how the derived connecting maps are defined, and [F1] makes balance commute with these comparisons. Therefore the squares proved in step 2.1 hold for the supplied resolutions as well. In degree zero both augmentations identify the common cocycles with Hom, giving its identity identification.

F1F3step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources