Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

The long exact Ext sequence in the first variable

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let A be abelian with enough projectives and enough injectives, and fix supplied projective and injective resolution data on all its objects. For 0MMM0 and every N, there is a natural exact sequence 0Hom(M,N)Hom(M,N)Hom(M,N)0Ext1(M,N)Ext1(M,N), where q:Extq(M,N)Extq+1(M,N); it is natural contravariantly in the short exact sequence and covariantly in N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A short exact sequence 0MMM0 and an object N.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Regard HomA(,N) as a left exact functor AopAb. A projective resolution in A is an injective resolution in Aop, so Right derived functors form a cohomological delta functor on the opposite category gives the displayed order and connecting maps.

givenconstruct
2.1

Translating the short exact sequence to the opposite category gives the three Hom terms in the displayed order and the maps q. The balanced Ext bifunctor identifies the right-derived groups with Ext, and delta-functor naturality gives contravariant naturality in the short exact sequence.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

To check covariance in N, fix a projective horseshoe 0PPP0 for the given short exact sequence, as supplied by The horseshoe lemma for projective resolutions. Its degreewise splitting makes 0Hom(P,N)Hom(P,N)Hom(P,N)0 a short exact sequence of cochain complexes. Postcomposition with v:NN gives a morphism from this sequence to the analogous one with coefficients N. By Naturality of the cohomology connecting morphism, all connecting squares commute. These are the horseshoe connecting maps used by the right-derived theorem in step 1.1. The comparison isomorphisms transporting the middle horseshoe resolution to the supplied one are induced by precomposition, which commutes with postcomposition by v. Thus the transported connecting maps, and hence the balanced Ext sequence of step 2.1, are covariantly natural in N.

step 2.1construct

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources