How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Injective-resolution Ext has the stated bifunctor variance
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Let be supplied injective resolution data on a class in an abelian category. For every , injective-resolution Ext is contravariant in and covariant in : and induce and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Objects , objects , and maps as stated.
Proof
Precomposition by is a cochain map . A comparison extension of is a cochain map , hence postcomposition gives the second cochain map.
Homotopic comparison extensions induce the same cohomology map, so the second map is choice-independent. Identity and composition of the comparison maps give the functor laws, with reversing arrows.
Depends on
Used by
- FALSE: Ext is covariant in both variables False statement
- The Ext balance isomorphism is natural in both variables Proposition
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)